 | | Re: 'Upgrading' VC
|
|
I'll see--right now I'm busy programming a VB program similar to WebBrick with the Phantom DLL as to support USB - I ordered the USB tower and a few lightbricks from PITSCo and they were shipped today....gotta hurry :P (...) (22 years ago, 6-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: 'Upgrading' VC
|
|
(...) SNIP (...) All of the Logitech Cam guts I've seen (primarily the eyeball shaped cams) use a similar size square circuit board. But, the electret mics and power LEDs differ, I think. (...) Unless the same chip is being used, I doubt if the (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Vision Command can see IR!?
|
|
Yep, that's right--I found a page sowewhere where someone used the remaining USB power offered by the computer to power 6 IR LEDs mounted on the front of the cam--night vision! (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics.vc)
|
| |
| | Re: 'Upgrading' VC
|
|
Yes, that's correct--I need the case. And, if I do do this, I'll just replce the entire USB cord with the QCP 4k's. (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: 'Upgrading' VC
|
|
(...) I have the Lego Cam, and while it sounds like a cool idea, I'm kind of confused. Why would you want to put a different chipset in there instead of just buying the whole Pro 4K webcam? You're going to have to get ahold of the board somehow, and (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | 'Upgrading' VC
|
|
I've had Vision Command for some time now, and it's worked great, after I got the XP patch I was even happier. But now that I've started using it as a robotic webcam that folks can control over the internet, I'm starting to see how poor the picture (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: sys_time not working
|
|
(...) Use get_system_up_time() instead (as modified below). #include <conio.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <time.h> #include <tm.h> #include <dsensor.h> #include <dmotor.h> long int t1,t2,t; int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { ......... ........ (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | sys_time not working
|
|
Hi i install successfully brickOS-0.2.6.10 under Win2000 without any problems and ran successfully "helloworld.lx" I created one first elementary small program using the sys_time function. The problem is that it doesn't compile correctly. The (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickOS installation with WinME and Cygnus problems
|
|
[SNIP] (...) [SNIP] Tom, I would follow Max's advice about posting your commands and output here. But one thing that might cause issues with your setup is your path. It looks like the windows dos commands (C:\WINDOWS\COMMAND) come before your cygwin (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickOS installation with WinME and Cygnus problems
|
|
(...) I would not try to follow both of these instructions. Pick one and do just exactly what that set of instructions says to do. My favorite, naturally, is the second set (since getting the right set of GCC source code and compiling it without (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickOS installation with WinME and Cygnus problems
|
|
(...) PATH=C:\WINDOWS;C:\W...IN\H8300-0 00821\H-I686-CYGWIN32\BIN; (...) OK, the best way to get help is: * Start with the *first* problem which occurs. Problem #3 is very likely the cause of #1 and #2. * Show *exactly* the commands you typed and (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | BrickOS installation with WinME and Cygnus problems
|
|
Hello, I have spent several hours trying to install BrickOS on my Windows ME system. I am a novice with C/Cygwin/linux, so have been diligently searching the Lugnet posts for clues. That has gotten me a little farther each day, but now I am _really_ (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | GASTON
|
|
See GASTON in action at (URL) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Porting LEGO Robotics Kit.
|
|
(...) So if your students already know C, why not program the Lego robots in C ? You could either use 'NQC' (which is a C subset specially designed to run on the standard Lego firmware) - or you could replace the standard Lego firmware with BrickOS (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Announcing Full Throttle - Control LDCC From Windows
|
|
I have just released (URL) version 1.00> of a program that I call Full Throttle. This Windows application uses your Mindstorms IR tower (either serial or USB) to communicate with an RCX that is running (URL) Mark Riley's LDCC replacement firmware> (...) (22 years ago, 4-Aug-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.robotics.rcx, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | how to get vision command update for win XP and win 2000
|
|
Rob limbaugh give me the info to get the update. LEGO has a new version of VC for "XP". It will also install on Win2K. Call Shop@Home and wait (don't press any buttons) and tell the person on the phone you need the new version of VC for XP. Chris. (22 years ago, 4-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics.vc)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with BrickOS installation
|
|
(...) I would recommend using the pre-built Hitachi tools which are still available from my BricxCC website. (URL) simpler than trying to download all the right versions of the GCC source code. John Hansen (22 years ago, 4-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Porting LEGO Robotics Kit.
|
|
Dear sir/madam, During the last week at our laboratory at the National Technical University of Athens, Greece, we have become interested in using the LEGO Robotics Kit, in order to allow students that take the course of "Computer Vision & Robotics" (...) (22 years ago, 4-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOTIC Humanoid
|
|
(...) Be careful if air volume is too big, it can act as air-tank too. But I think you' ve got a good idea that should work. You should close this added circuit when you use the pump function. (...) (22 years ago, 4-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOTIC Humanoid
|
|
Chris, I love your style. You do an excellent job of using structural parts aesthetically. In other words, you combine function with form very well. By the way, I was looking at your one-way pneumatic valve. Is it really necessary to cut the top off (...) (22 years ago, 3-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
