 | | Re: backgrounds logo image (was: Re: [ldraw.org] Update) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | Todd Lehman wrote: <snip a bunch of technical stuff> OK, OK. I still think I'm right though, just too lazy to compose as long a reply as you did. I'm arguing about something which I think is to YOUR benefit, so I'll stop. I may be trying to teach (...) (25 years ago, 21-Aug-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: backgrounds logo image (was: Re: [ldraw.org] Update) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | Todd: On a tangential topic... is it Fibblesnork, fibblesnork.com, or both that you are asserting trademark on? (I assume both) This discussion caused me to spend some time revising and extending my Disclaimers Page ((URL) which I happen to think is (...) (25 years ago, 21-Aug-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: backgrounds logo image (was: Re: [ldraw.org] Update) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) Just the first one. --Todd (25 years ago, 21-Aug-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: backgrounds logo image (was: Re: [ldraw.org] Update) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) I _don't_ necessarily think you're _not_ right (vis-à-vis deep linking of banner and button images). It's just such an insignificant thing to worry about in the grand scheme of things, IMHO. Especially when deep linking presents problems that (...) (25 years ago, 21-Aug-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: backgrounds logo image (was: Re: [ldraw.org] Update) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Well if they're not text links, what are they to be then? You've removed the logo, right? So text is only choice available. Under the first numbered item, nothing other than backgrounds themselves is allowed to be copied and you don't support (...) (25 years ago, 21-Aug-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: backgrounds logo image (was: Re: [ldraw.org] Update) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | Another tangential question... why item #5? (...) An earlier version of my factoring form had the white image as background for the whole thing, except the table cell at the very top which is sort of a title block (that part now has white bricks, (...) (25 years ago, 21-Aug-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: backgrounds logo image (was: Re: [ldraw.org] Update) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) Hmm, good question. IIRC, #5 was written long before backgrounds could be put into tables. So the motivation behind #5 wouldn't have been aesthetic, but rather to limit the ripping off of the images as a collection. But #4 already addressed (...) (25 years ago, 22-Aug-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: backgrounds logo image (was: Re: [ldraw.org] Update) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Use your imagination. If someone wanted, they could use any of: * Plain text (obviously :) * Rendered text, as seen for example in the left column of (URL) * A screenshot/thumbnail (almost certainly fair use if it's not too big), with or (...) (25 years ago, 21-Aug-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: backgrounds logo image (was: Re: [ldraw.org] Update) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | Once again, insufficient precision results in my looking rather foolish (but I meant to do that, I never make misteaks). (...) <various hypothetical, but not branded, non text ways of depicting a hyperlink> What I was getting at is that while (...) (25 years ago, 23-Aug-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
