 | | Re: RSS vs. Atom (was: Attention All RSS Geeks)
|
|
(...) You really shouldn't have to apologize. I didn't meant it this way. I just thought the topic is of no interest, without any subjective assessment. But so much the better that you carry on with LENNI, I'm really glad about it. Unfortunalety, (...) (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: RSS vs. Atom (was: Attention All RSS Geeks)
|
|
(...) * Administrative (both LENNI and content providers) * Market-ish (as Larry mentioned) * Poll? (...) How about "Category"? (...) Yah, should be able to allow that. An item can be of multiple themes... Can it be of multiple categories? (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: RSS vs. Atom (was: Attention All RSS Geeks)
|
|
(...) For Sale (so that people can filter it out!) or some more generic marketish tag (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: RSS vs. Atom (was: Attention All RSS Geeks)
|
|
(...) Oh! Oh! How about Content Type (not CDATA): News Blog MOC Announcement (or is this redundant with news or MOC?) Calendar Item ... what else? Probably need a better label than "Content Type" since that terminology is already used technically (...) (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: RSS vs. Atom (was: Attention All RSS Geeks)
|
|
(...) Yeah, good point - I had my software developer hat on (lazy boy Kelly) and not the Visionary On The Mount hat ("all that and a side of fries!") you need for setting up something like this... BTW, I'd like to make sure appropriate people are (...) (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Attention all RSS geeks!
|
|
(...) That there are two methods on which we could base LENNI, and it's fairly apparent to me that one needs to be chosen over the other. Dual development is a hindrance in the long run. (...) Not this minute, but definitely soon. I think the next (...) (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Attention all RSS geeks!
|
|
In lugnet.publish, Dan Boger wrote: (a lot of very informative stuff that made my head spin a bit, although I now think I know which Dan favors which does carry some weight with me, Dan's often right, technically... ) So what's the net here? Does (...) (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: RSS vs. Atom (was: Attention All RSS Geeks)
|
|
(...) Adding tags to the spec isn't "expensive" - and since clients won't be required to implement support for new tags, unless they want to, I say, let's think of anything we can want, and then decide if it's worth adding to the spec or not. :) (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Attention all RSS geeks!
|
|
(...) Heh, the biggest political fight of recent techies. Used to be XML, but that has settled down considerably. I used to follow the fight, but got really tired of it... I did come the conclusion that Mark Pilgrim (of the Atom side) knows what (...) (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: RSS vs. Atom (was: Attention All RSS Geeks)
|
|
(...) Sorry about that, got distracted! Mostly BrickFest, some other things. Back on it again, and your email from 1 August was very helpful in setting the direction for LENNI. (...) I think both Atom and RSS as a base would allow us to do this. (...) (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
