 | | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) Nevertheless, if you read the rest of the thread, Eric did make a (URL) commitment of sorts> not to do it again. So he either willfully disregarded that, or simply forgot, when posting this latest auction. Either one doesn't fill me with any (...) (19 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Warnings( was: WAKE UP!)
|
|
(...) Actually, that raises another question. Should admins disregard advice/warnings given by others (non-admins and admins in non-admin role) in making decisions about timeouts/bans? Seems to me they should count for something, though exactly how (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) Which "certain others"? ROSCO (19 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) John's not an admin. A PERMANENT ban would still be shotgun against puppy without prior warning, IMHO. A temporary ban is what apparently has been imposed though. (wasn't very clear at first, still isn't very clear although it is somewhat (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
--SNIP-- (...) As I mentioned the first response to Eric, he has in fact been (URL) told before>. Tim --SNIP-- (19 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: E: A Retrospective
|
|
(...) To quote Anders: "Stupid question: In whatever way will that post help?" (19 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) I see nothing inconsistent here. Eric should get an indefinite timeout until he requests cancels on the posts that clearly are over the line, acknowledges he erred and that the ToS does apply to him, and apologises for causing part of the (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.people) !
|
| |
| | E: A Retrospective
|
|
Now that Lugnet's resident "tortured artiste" has gone, leave behine a whiff of prescribed substances and stale sweat, I'd like to share our memories of this somewhat talented, and amusingly unstable individual. Mine would have to be (URL) - nothing (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) I'm fairly sure Eric might try to off himself if his posting privileges were permanently revoked. Dunno if that's the reason Larry is suggesting softer treatment for a greater offense, but it's something to consider. Soren (19 years ago, 2-Apr-06, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) Hmmm, interesting to compare that view of Eric, who has shown a wilful disregard for the ToS, with (URL) your opinion of Jojo>. (...) That would involve someone deciding what "completely inappropriate" is. But as you brought it up, which posts (...) (19 years ago, 2-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) Me for one. It was deserved but I sincerely hope this is a timeout, to be lifted when Eric apologises and indicates he understands that he needs to comply with the ToS, and will do so, and not a permanent loss. Further, and just as (...) (19 years ago, 2-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) Thank you for this Suz (and Todd?). I realise that it must have been a hard decision to make but I feel it was the right one under the circumstances. Tim To Eric, When I first posted in response to you my only intention was to get you to admit (...) (19 years ago, 2-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: The Qwelder Mech - FOR SALE not IM related
|
|
(URL) sorry about that>> (19 years ago, 1-Apr-06, to lugnet.people.support, lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Halcyon days? (was Re: Just great.)
|
|
(...) I see no such implication in anything Dave wrote here. (...) Huh? Not that I have anything against elitism, but LUGNET doesn't seem to even have any mechanisms for an elite, aside from background stuff (whether or not a set is put in the (...) (19 years ago, 1-Apr-06, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Halcyon days? (was Re: Just great.)
|
|
(...) Well I think (URL) this> comes pretty close, but I suppose that's subjective. ROSCO (19 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Why I still like lugnet
|
|
(...) Lugnet is my first stop every week day morning as it has been for 8 years or so. I read it every work day and participate when I can. Though I might not always have time to comment on creations, I do check them out and get inspired by them. I (...) (19 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Why I still like lugnet
|
|
Just thought I need to say that I still like Lugnet a lot no matter how much Eric and the anti-trolls tick me off. My experience is no better or worse than it used to be although there are less cool creations due to the exodus of space and castle (...) (19 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Halcyon days? (was Re: Just great.)
|
|
(...) Why is it always implied that newer members are largely to blame for LUGNET's decline? It seems to me that more often than not, newer members are even more uncomfortable here than you vetrans. LUGNET more than any other LEGO fan site, seems to (...) (19 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Halcyon days? (was Re: Just great.)
|
|
(...) Hi Dave, You make a good point about the signal:noise ratio 1. With that I agree. I'm not sure that the dramas were so much in hidden forums as there was enough masking but either way I agree with your point. I would be worried if I saw (...) (19 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Halcyon days? (was Re: Just great.)
|
|
(...) Well, all right. I don't really care about flame-wars because they're self-evidently juvenile and they tend to involve the same flamers over and over again. I myself have lamented what I will refer to as Rhinoceros Dominance (search for (...) (19 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
|
