 | | Re: Help unsubscribing from news by e-mail
|
|
Yes, there is. Just add the proper group to the "Newsgroups" field, or request that any replies to your message be followed up to the proper group. I've gone ahead and done it for you. (I thought it had been done already, but was mistaken) -Duane (...) (22 years ago, 29-Apr-03, to lugnet.people.newbie, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Help unsubscribing from news by e-mail
|
|
Is there a way of contacting the Lugnet admins to ask them for help in getting this sorted out? Steve "Duane Hess" <LEGOZILLA@HOTMAIL.COM> wrote in message news:HE30EB.1GFE@lugnet.com... (...) I go (...) confirmation (...) (22 years ago, 29-Apr-03, to lugnet.people.newbie)
|
| |
| | Re: Help unsubscribing from news by e-mail
|
|
Ditto. Duane.Hess@NOSPAMcexp.com -Duane (...) (22 years ago, 29-Apr-03, to lugnet.people.newbie)
|
| |
| | Re: Help unsubscribing from news by e-mail
|
|
Same problem here, for my old jhkruer@yahoo.com address. -JHK (...) (22 years ago, 29-Apr-03, to lugnet.people.newbie)
|
| |
| | Help unsubscribing from news by e-mail
|
|
Hi, I'm currently subscribed to receive lugnet.space and lugnet.starwars by e-mail. Works a treat and I get lots of mail. However, I now want to unsubscribe (and continue reading by NNTP). When I go to (URL) and enter my email and confirmation code (...) (22 years ago, 26-Apr-03, to lugnet.people.newbie)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest Registration
|
|
On 11:27 2003-04-28 +0000, Christina Hitchcock wrote (...) Hello, Stephen the BrickFest DB guy again... The problems that surfaced this morning with the registration site seem to have been fixed. The problems were isolated to IE6 and seemed to (...) (22 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.events.brickfest, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | BrickFest Registration
|
|
BrickFest™ Registration form is now available via the website. (URL) will be a bit different this year. Everyone that registers will get a password. The password will give each person access to their own registration information so that they may (...) (22 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.events.brickfest, lugnet.announce, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.people) !
|
| |
| | Who is Matthew Be?
|
|
Hello! I was browsing Brickshelf this morning and I landed on the folder of "Matthew Be" ((URL) like to communicate with him but I can't find his e-mail adress. :-( Does anybody here knows who is "Matthew Be" and/or could tell me how I can (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
|
Whoa. Did this thread stray or what? (Just look at the dots.) Tryin' to keep it light, -H.Man :) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
|
Ohh, that was "you guys" not you specifically. Didnt mean to aim that at one person. :) Also wanted to mention as i am sure it will come up.. I am not worried about the defensability of my faith. I have no 'need' to defend it. Christ can defend (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
|
Well. I am not looking for a big heavy discussion. If the participants arent going to be friendly then I am not intersted and that is the general vibe that I hear about it. I am also not interested in deep theological discusions. I didnt come here (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
|
|
I do want to apologize for one thing. When I wrote that post with all the smileyes I was acting under the assumption that you would be comfortable with some friendly poking and jesting about the subject. Obviosly I was mistaken and you take this (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
|
(...) .debate doesn't suffer fools gladly, no. If you just waltz in there and tell people you have some Good News for them, you're not likely to get a warm reception. (...) and some silliness, and you have the common sense to tell which is which, (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
|
(...) Abednego, I think. When I was a kid, I was taught a little mnemonic; "shake the bed, make the bed, and to bed we go." Innocent then, but now I think it could have other implications ;') The Rev. might get a kick out of that one... I wonder (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
|
(...) I'm not as compartmentalized a dork here as some, but with every post I read in this thread I only restrain myself from saying "take it to ot.debate" for the same reason given to you by others and by Dave! (...) The whole thing does belong (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
|
(...) Heh. That used to mess me up, too. It means that you will tag your message to send Follow-Ups To another posting group. (...) In fairness to the readship, it's not yet a debate because you haven't yet moved to off-topic.debate. (...) It's a (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
|
|
I'm too newb to know what FUT is so if someone wants to enlighten me I'll make any adjustments that I can. We already briefly had the discussion about the locations of these discussions and it was generally sugested that lugnet.people and (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
|
|
(...) After (...) It is unfortunate. Though I dont feel it is desperate I do have a built in need to talk about God that God has placed within me and as such getting to know me inherrently involves putting up with some level of it. If you really (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Re: Thank You Tim (was Re: For some Lego is a religous experience.)
|
|
(...) in, (...) Well I dont preach dogma. I speak about a personal saving faith that is individual to each person. But thank you for removing general. I wasnt sure on it. In general (pun intended :) I leave the group decisions up to other people. I (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Thank You Tim (was Re: For some Lego is a religous experience.)
|
|
"Tim Courtney" <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:HDs1JE.zuF@lugnet.com... (...) would (...) its (...) Tim has got it right- fun.community and .people sound fine to me but no doubt about it- please don't post on .general* My own advise, if (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
