 | | Re: Mid September meeting...
|
|
(...) Well until you posted I was going to say the 18th because the 17th Joe can't make and I can't make the 19th. I suppose the 16th is a possibility although that reduces our choices for eating establishements. Is there anyone that can't make the (...) (22 years ago, 11-Sep-02, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
| | Re: Mid September meeting...
|
|
thanks for the response. I'm 27, work in film and video for a couple of colleges here in boston and cambridge , and have been doing legos religiously since I was 2... I just got active in lugnet and have been having a great time, especially with the (...) (22 years ago, 11-Sep-02, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
| | Re: Mid September meeting...
|
|
(...) should (...) The 16th works well for me. The 17th is more difficult, but can be made to fit. The 18th is plumb out of the question for me The 19th looks superb :P I'd vote for the 19th, but can probably accomodate the 16th, or 17th as well. (...) (22 years ago, 11-Sep-02, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
| | Re: Mid September meeting...
|
|
(...) I'm sorry that your post went unanswered for a week. Unfortunately, many posts in many different Lugnet venues slip by under the radar; sometimes this means a reply is late in coming, while other times it means that a deserving post never gets (...) (22 years ago, 11-Sep-02, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
| | Re: Mid September meeting...
|
|
thanks for all of your super positive welcomes. Judging by the overwhelming amount of feedback I received to this most ungratious request, I'm guessing that your super freindly club is closed for new membership? -tk "travis" <phree@attbi.com> wrote (...) (22 years ago, 11-Sep-02, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
| | Re: My attempt at designing a layout for Greenberg
|
|
"Eric Kingsley" <kingsley@nelug.org> wrote in message news:H28K6z.Dpz@lugnet.com... (...) before the (...) see (...) the (...) people (...) I'm planning on building something new...I'll keep you posted! - Joe (22 years ago, 10-Sep-02, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
| | Re: My attempt at designing a layout for Greenberg
|
|
In lugnet.org.us.nelug, Jonathan Dallas writes: Fair enough on all points, I probably won't have time to relook this before the meeting. I think some of our differences are obvious and I would like to see what other people think. I have to see if (...) (22 years ago, 10-Sep-02, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
| | Re: My attempt at designing a layout for Greenberg
|
|
(...) Speaking from our experience, people like bridges. Bridges are cool. Especially if they look like they're too fragile to support a train -- but of course we know that they're plenty strong, because we built 'em! And moving (drawbridge, (...) (22 years ago, 10-Sep-02, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
| | Re: Mid September meeting...
|
|
(...) The only day that week that I can't make it is the 17th so I'd rather have it on the 18th. Jonathan (22 years ago, 10-Sep-02, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
| | Re: My attempt at designing a layout for Greenberg
|
|
Well I've been reluctant to comment, because I didn't want it to look like mud throwing, but I just feel I have to say something though. In lugnet.org.us.nelug, Eric Kingsley writes: <snip> (...) There actually might be too much space. I see the (...) (22 years ago, 10-Sep-02, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
| | Re: Definitions: LUG or LTC
|
|
(...) Why, I'm hurt. They never went offline: (URL) of course this was a subtle kick/nudge to the back of the head to get me going on the captions again. How long can one procrastinate, one might ask oneself (?). Not much longer, one might answer (...) (22 years ago, 8-Sep-02, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
| | Re: Upcoming Greenberg shows.
|
|
Well I think I finally came up with a layout that maximizes our space. (URL) listed below all of the design desecions that I used in this layout. Do to the fact that I am very anal with these types of designs the list is quite long, but very well (...) (22 years ago, 8-Sep-02, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
| | Re: Definitions: LUG or LTC
|
|
(...) Let's explore this a little further. You're saying that if the hypothetical Mr. Hawk felt that he was the victim of gross emotional damage, he couldn't go after the partners' houses, cars, first-born children, or other white elephants, but (...) (22 years ago, 7-Sep-02, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
| | Re: Definitions: LUG or LTC
|
|
(...) Yeah sorry I guess I wasn't spacific enough. We are a Limited Partnership which limits our liability to the value of NELUG's assets, which while substantial from the groups perspective they are minimal in terms of real value. <humor> Of course (...) (22 years ago, 7-Sep-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
| | Re: Definitions: LUG or LTC
|
|
(...) Did you look into forming an LLC or an LLP? In a regular partnership I'd be worried that someone would slip on a brick or something at a NELUG event and try to sue the pants off of the partners. (22 years ago, 6-Sep-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
| | Re: Definitions: LUG or LTC
|
|
(...) Well I will give it a try, it was about 2 years ago that we set it up so some details may be a little off. I will also say that I have some very good family resources in that my Mother is a Lawyer and my father is an Accountant and they gave (...) (22 years ago, 6-Sep-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
| | Re: Definitions: LUG or LTC
|
|
(...) Eric, can you tell me more about why you set up the club as a Partnership, what where your other options (i.e. non-profit group, Incorporation, etc.) The reason I ask is that I've been thinking of doing something simliar with the NGLTC but I (...) (22 years ago, 5-Sep-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
| | Re: Definitions: LUG or LTC
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Eric Kingsley writes: [snip] (...) Thanks, but I must also congratulate you on such a good post, regardless of length. (I'm guilty of long-windedness too anyway.) I just want to agree with most everything Eric wrote about LUGs and (...) (22 years ago, 5-Sep-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
| | My attempt at designing a layout for Greenberg
|
|
I decided to start a new thread to detail my vision of what our next layout could look like. (That nasty reversing loop has been successfully eliminated). Layout (URL) let me say I am supprised how much more flexibility 3 tables gives us. Here is a (...) (22 years ago, 5-Sep-02, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
| | Re: Upcoming Greenberg shows.
|
|
(...) I inadvertently included a reversing loop. It won't affect any MOC's but I will need to move or eliminate one or two switches. No big deal but I didn't want anyone calling me on it before I owned up to my boo-boo. Eric (...) (22 years ago, 5-Sep-02, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
