Subject:
|
Re: Definitions: LUG or LTC
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us.nelug
|
Date:
|
Sat, 7 Sep 2002 18:12:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1036 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Eric Kingsley writes:
> <humor>
>
> In this purely hypothetical situation "Sean" is bombarding "Ray" with
> e-mails in order to get the latest rule set before everyone else or to
> change rules that don't suit his style of play. These e-mails come 4
> to 5 times a day at times. Then "Sean" finds out that "Susan" gets
> regular updates from "Ray" often without barely asking where many of
> "Sean's" e-mails go unanswered. This just infuriates "Sean" sending
> him off the deep end with all sorts of Flames at "Ray" including
> threats of non-violent mayhem including the destruction of models of
> "Ray" in effigy durring play of his role playing game.
Let's explore this a little further. You're saying that if the hypothetical
Mr. Hawk felt that he was the victim of gross emotional damage, he couldn't
go after the partners' houses, cars, first-born children, or other white
elephants, but would instead have to settle for some portion of NELUG's Lego
supply? I'm seeing all kinds of advantages to this LLP setup!
P.S: Shaun! I've developed a sudden, overriding, and
completely-unrelated-to-any-hypothetical-legal-action nostalgia for those
old Ghoirboy pictures. How soon are they going back online?
> </humor>
- Mike.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Definitions: LUG or LTC
|
| (...) Why, I'm hurt. They never went offline: (URL) of course this was a subtle kick/nudge to the back of the head to get me going on the captions again. How long can one procrastinate, one might ask oneself (?). Not much longer, one might answer (...) (22 years ago, 8-Sep-02, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
