Subject:
|
Re: Near Final Release, rtlToronto15 info
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Thu, 6 Nov 2003 19:12:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
492 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Derek Raycraft wrote:
>
> Unfortunately we don't yet know if a Control Lab can do this, but I will
> be looking into it.
Well, if a CL can't flip active/passive (which I'm positive it can't, since it's
separate ports for active and passive sensors), we could simply wire a motor
port to a passive sensor on the control lab and make that the interface for one
bot. Then the sensor can receive the signal, and the float/brake motor can send
it.
We just need to have a rule like "if your RCX blows out the Arbitrator, you pay
for it", because CLs don't have the guards and protections that RCXs do.
Chris: As long as the player interface remains as it appears in the current
Rules, it doesn't matter how the actual implementation is -- direct wire with a
tap or broken wire is the same to the players.
Mike
See you all at the hobby show!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
14 Messages in This Thread:
   
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
