To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 9777
9776  |  9778
Subject: 
Re: Near Final Release, rtlToronto15 info
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Wed, 5 Nov 2003 19:25:41 GMT
Viewed: 
461 times
  
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Derek Raycraft wrote:
-1 minute to make a move is a very long time, I think the time limit
should be drop to at least around 45 seconds.  This gives 15 minutes a
side with an overall length of 30 minutes.  The idea of the clock is to
put time pressure on the game.  20 minutes is way to leisurely.  I'd be
happy with an even sorter time limit then 15 minutes.
At least for the hobby show demonstration, my bot will be making moves in
realtime or close to to it. (ie, 2-3 seconds per move) The scanning and
droppingtakes ~20 seconds, so I'd be happy to see the time limit dramatically
reduced.

-The coin toss makes the outcome too random.  Players should have to
play each other twice.  Shortening the time limit would help with this.
Only in the finals, IMO.

-I'm not entirely comfortable with the sensor outputs being tided
directly together.  In this situation you will have two rcxs powering
the line plus the Arbitrator.  Thats a lot of power being added
together.  I will definitely have no part of having motor outputs
attached to the sensor lines.
With one wire for both ways communication, couldn't we have the wire from A and
the wire from B connect to different ports on the Arbitrator? This way the
Arbitrator can work something like the following:

while (true)
{
  ds_active(&SENSOR1);
  ds_passive(&SENSOR2);

  while(!TOUCH2); // wait for bot2 to finish
  delay(100);

  ds_active(&SENSOR2);
  ds_passive(&SENSOR1);

  while(!TOUCH1); // wait for bot1 to finish
  delay(100);
}

This prevents the 'double click' problem where the Arbitrator loses track of
whose turn it is, and also isolates the two bots from each other. Additional
code could be added to set both sensors back to passive after a short 'press'.

Mike



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Near Final Release, rtlToronto15 info
 
(...) Unfortunately we don't yet know if a Control Lab can do this, but I will be looking into it. Derek (21 years ago, 6-Nov-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Near Final Release, rtlToronto15 info
 
(...) -My understanding was there would be some common space to the sides of the board. -1 minute to make a move is a very long time, I think the time limit should be drop to at least around 45 seconds. This gives 15 minutes a side with an overall (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

14 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR