Subject:
|
Re: Modular Connect 4 robots?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 22:31:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
400 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Calum Tsang wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I had an idea. What if people built their robots in a modular fashion?
>
> There's always a mechanism RCX and a logic RCX. The logic RCX runs the game
> engine and tells the mechanism brick what todo. Everything is functionalized
> into "Drop at Column N", "I'm done dropping" and "Scan the Board" and "Here's
> the board bitmap".
Gee...I wonder why we don't do that for every game?
Oh, I remember, we’re strongly independent and we encourage innovative and
unique solutions to a problem. How many times have you argued that exact point?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Modular Connect 4 robots?
|
| (...) Because in this game, Bruce, there are a lot of people who won't be able to do the software part at all. Breaking apart the software AND hardware doesn't discourage any innovative or unique solutions. You can have a really cool way of scanning (...) (21 years ago, 16-Sep-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Modular Connect 4 robots?
|
| Hey guys, I had an idea. What if people built their robots in a modular fashion? There's always a mechanism RCX and a logic RCX. The logic RCX runs the game engine and tells the mechanism brick what todo. Everything is functionalized into "Drop at (...) (21 years ago, 16-Sep-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
