Subject:
|
Re: rtlToronto14 AC rule change?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Fri, 29 Aug 2003 16:17:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
527 times
|
| |
|
|
Mark Riley wrote:
> It IS intereresting that having the AC cord was put up for
> a vote, but the disqualification rule wasn't... :-)
The entanglement rule was pre-existing. The result of breaking that
rule would be disqualification. Calum just wants to make it clear to
the competitors what they risked by using AC.
Derek
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: rtlToronto14 AC rule change?
|
| (...) It IS intereresting that having the AC cord was put up for a vote, but the disqualification rule wasn't... :-) (...) Yes, but more importantly, why do they have an *on* button? Mark (okay, back to lurking...) (21 years ago, 29-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
