Subject:
|
Re: rtlToronto14 AC rule change?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Fri, 29 Aug 2003 16:11:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
480 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote:
>
>
> Derek Raycraft wrote:
>
> > Chris Magno wrote:
> > > UH calum.... clearly by making a rule that will allow a robot to win by default, you have
> > > changed the nature of the game.
> > >
> > > ergo.... FIX IT!!!!
> >
> > I see a very easy fix to this problem. :-)
> >
> > Derek
>
> ya,
>
> don't let calum pretend to be a lawyer and make rules.
It IS intereresting that having the AC cord was put up for
a vote, but the disqualification rule wasn't... :-)
> --
> Chris
>
> Why do solar calculators have an off button?
Yes, but more importantly, why do they have an *on*
button?
Mark (okay, back to lurking...)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: rtlToronto14 AC rule change?
|
| (...) The entanglement rule was pre-existing. The result of breaking that rule would be disqualification. Calum just wants to make it clear to the competitors what they risked by using AC. Derek (21 years ago, 29-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
