To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 4499
4498  |  4500
Subject: 
Re: rtl11 Concerns, finalized date and stuff soon
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Tue, 28 May 2002 03:05:25 GMT
Viewed: 
1169 times
  
> a) RCXes.  Currently we're at a single RCX rule.  Does anyone feel that this
> contest might require two RCXes, especially since the flag can be anywhere
> on the middle table?


I'm at odds with this.  It was my(?) idea to tout the 1 rcx rule so that
I could justify a NEVER AGAIN 1 rcx rule.  but if this need to be a
multi rcx game..... on the other hand Ka-On the super lego guy claims to
be able to do it with a scout........

(shrug) i remain on the fence.

> 
> b) Random Flag Placement.  Do we want to put the flag anywhere or just in
> the center of the center table?  Since we've had a very bad track record of
> finding objects and locations in rtl, Iain suggested today everyone might
> just run over the flag instead of search, detect and manipulate the flag.


I say lets place the flag randomly AFTER your bot is placed in the start
square.


> c) Flag Top.  Currently a single full bushing.  Anyone against replacing
> this with a pulley wheel for easier gripping/indexing?


don't care, make it a timmy mini fig for what its worth.


> d) Robots not going across.  One person emailed and asked if it was okay to
> stay on your home island and grab the flag remotely.  I'm of the opinion
> this is just as hard as crossing the chasm (ooh, irritating business
> buzzphrase!) so it should be allowed.
> 
> 

even thought it is not in the spirit of the game I think a "baby gate"
or expanding arm is a valid way to solve this game.



Chris
Pretend this says something funny



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: rtl11 Concerns, finalized date and stuff soon
 
(...) He he I am not quite 'super' yet. I just believe that there is no need to use motor or sensor to deploy the bridge. (24 years ago, 28-May-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

Message is in Reply To:
  rtl11 Concerns, finalized date and stuff soon
 
Hi folks, I need some commentary on a few issues, as I'm going to book the room in the next few days for August 17th, 2002. a) RCXes. Currently we're at a single RCX rule. Does anyone feel that this contest might require two RCXes, especially since (...) (24 years ago, 27-May-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

9 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR