Subject:
|
Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto19: Balance of Power Tentative Ruleset
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Wed, 20 Jul 2005 14:42:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
830 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Rob Antonishen <rob.antonishen@gmail.com> wrote:
> I first read that as "The robot does not need to be on its side" as in
> on ITS side, rather than upright. you know....like....sideways..
>
> Now I understand :)
>
> so......no other restrictions other than the 'must fit between the
> pivot and 12" marker' rule, eh?
Well, I can't really think of anything that would really need regulation. Weight...well, there's only so much you can make out of Lego. You can make it a game of Sumo if you want, you can try something altogether crazy and do something else.
My personal desire for this contest is to see a wide range of strategies tried.
I know 50%-75% will be sumo like robots. But I think there are a number of
novel approaches here.
Calum
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto19: Balance of Power Tentative Ruleset
|
| On Wed, July 20, 2005 9:42 am, Calum Tsang said: (...) Actually, re-reading this, I do have one change to suggest, that should make it a tiny bit more interesting to watch. If the robots start (as listed) side-by-side, they will move, what about 1 (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jul-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
