 | | Re: r10 Project X -- Rules update
|
|
(...) AHHHHHHhh its just so overwhelming...... :) too many questions, so little time. I'm not going to say another thing about rules and scoring until i hear from more people...... what say you all??? I ran some more numbers and a higher penalty for (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | A little bit of History
|
|
In trying to style-up a new robot design at work (*I* think it's ugly), I was poking around online. I remembered being really drawn to what I understood was one of the earliest (if not the first industrial robot) when I was younger, and tried (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: off road technic set at Sears Clearance site
|
|
(...) Odd. I just bought it at the Sears Clearance Centre in Brampton for 89.95 (A week ago). They also had *another* Vision Command for $35. This is in addition to the one bought by an RTL member after I informed everyone about my German RIS 2.0 (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Train3 Pictures
|
|
Greetings Jean-Marc! I just wanted to drop you a line to say "thank you" fo letting me build the Thatcher-Perkins at the show on Saturday. I'm sorry I had to run without saying goodbye and thanking you. I realized at 3:10 that I was supposed to be (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: r10 Project X -- Rules update
|
|
(...) I guess no one is going to cheat, but if my bot just say it is done at 0 sec then my score would be 24 sec at worst. So the penalty time for wrong block need to increase - I suggest 6 sec. Also how are we going to count the overall score? Do (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: r10 Project X -- Rules update
|
|
(...) It isn't bad, and it is a far cry from Rob's idea of zero points for an unsuccessfull design... :-/ (...) Good luck on putting out a design... and have fun south o' the border... :) Ben pretend Iain is going to work on his tan in Florida!! :) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: r10 Project X -- Rules update
|
|
"Jeff Elliott" <jeffe@telepres.com> wrote in message news:3C56BD23.6EF3CC...res.com... (...) This is the best idea I've seen yet. I wanted to suggest scoring via time, but because I hate math :) I couldn't bother trying to come up with something. I (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: r10 Project X -- Rules update
|
|
(...) At the risk of being wishy-washy..... I like this. It makes sense, and it address rob's concern. (right?) example: Time = time in seconds + 1 sec for not perfect block + 3 sec for "wrong" blocks. (these penalty times are based on what i figure (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | off road technic set at Sears Clearance site
|
|
For those of us who didn't get to COSTCO in time... Sears clearance site has the off-road for 107.99 (URL) just ordered one to catch up with the rest of you... and so it begins, my first LEGO expense of 2002 I was in TRU on the weekend and they had (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: r10 Project X -- Rules update
|
|
OK folks, since I don't have a robot competing, perhaps I'll throw out some suggestions: Some scoring rules I've heard bandied around are: First to finish: +20 or +50... Block wrong: -10 or disqualified Block mispositioned: -5 I'd observe that in (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
