|
|
 | | Re: robots, not trains
|
| (...) Except if you use LegOS. You can compile the program as a native srec, but you need to put code in the startup to run your program when it's switched on, or equivalent. Regards ROSCO (23 years ago, 31-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | LUG volume post (was robots, not trains)
|
| (...) Ben, this is something I've noticed as well. I think its cool, that our little LUG (sorry Calum) is popular. and I'll even be be happy to say that i don't care if this lug is populated with posts about EITHER Trains or robots. HECK, if there (...) (23 years ago, 31-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: robots, not trains
|
| (...) Any RCX needs the run switch pressed. either by pressing the green button on the unit itself, OR by sending it the IR command for run. (like the remote) As Calum typed, and I just tried, have the second rcx run in a loop of nothing, UNTIL a (...) (23 years ago, 31-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: robots, not trains
|
| (...) Rob, its funny that you should mention that.... Calum was surprised more people didn't show up at a certain past show... (we already know....) considering that (he said) there were over 100 at the robot competition versus only about 15 at the (...) (23 years ago, 31-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: robots, not trains
|
| (...) Well, couldn't you set up a program which watches the sensor port for a resistance value and when you flip the switch, have it trigger a subroutine? Have the RCX always running, but only starting your actions when you get the sensor condition. (...) (23 years ago, 31-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: robots, not trains
|
| (...) I've had 3 rcx's for a while and I've never had them talking to one another. that's an oversite on my part think i'll try it (23 years ago, 31-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | robots, not trains
|
| Hi everyone (but especially the robot people). I thought I would post a pretty dumb question that I already know the answer to. But the point is, that it is a robotics question, and we are seldom seeing anything but trains here these days... So here (...) (23 years ago, 31-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Track counts
|
| (...) Let's see, $28US+tax each, converted to Canadian... that's almost $350 Cdn! Ouch. That's gotta hurt. I hope someone can swap you some rights for lefts. BTW, if you do any more track designs, post them. I like looking at other peoples ideas for (...) (23 years ago, 31-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Train 1
|
| (...) Oh yeah I saw those pieces - quite rare indeed! The average person would just overlook those pieces. :) Good luck in your quest to get your hands on a metroliner! Bryan (23 years ago, 31-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.org.ca.parlugment)
| | | | | Re: Train 1
|
| (...) I won a pair of fake electrical contacts for the top of the Metroliner. (URL) going to collect mine piece by piece. Just kidding. I am bidding on 2 right now, and God willing, I hope to get one of them. I'm getting desperate... Tim Strutt 8^) (23 years ago, 31-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.org.ca.parlugment)
| | | | | Re: Train 2 catch phrase
|
| "Benjamin Medinets" <bmedinets@aol.com> wrote in message news:GE5ErB.88G@lugnet.com... (...) That, and a dance club. I'm thinking RCX for three-phase optical sensory overload. Iain (23 years ago, 31-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | more Train 1 pics added
|
| Hi guys, I have added more pictures from the show (URL) new pics are labled 001-1.jpg to 019-19.jpg Enjoy, Jeff (23 years ago, 30-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Train 2 catch phrase
|
| (...) LOL! I like it! Are you going to grow the growth to match his mugshot? Tim Strutt 8^) (23 years ago, 30-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Train 2 catch phrase
|
| (...) Dave: Gee, Gosh, Don't think of it as YOUR caboose. It should be thought of more as a Symbol of all things TRAIN1. < silly > In this photo, there is symbolism, as well as, a belief of the artist expressing views on word piece (sic), and the (...) (23 years ago, 30-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Train 2 catch phrase
|
| (...) into making a 'bot for the rtl8?? Waittaminit, I already *have* a 'bot for rtl8. So there you are. Dave (23 years ago, 30-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Train 2 catch phrase
|
| (...) Isn't that what every town needs a "jailbreak TONY" :) (23 years ago, 30-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Train 2 catch phrase
|
| "Benjamin Medinets" <bmedinets@aol.com> wrote in message news:GE5Bpv.3Dx@lugnet.com... (...) "troublesome (...) No no, sorry... maybe TONY will show up and cause a jailbreak :) Iain (23 years ago, 30-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Train 2 catch phrase
|
| "Benjamin Medinets" <bmedinets@aol.com> wrote in message news:GE5Bpv.3Dx@lugnet.com... (...) "troublesome (...) Well, I think someone might just have to escape from jail and wreak some havoc. :) Iain (23 years ago, 30-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Train 2 catch phrase
|
| (...) Unfortunately...there's a chance that "Imperial Soldier" will be retired as "mini-ben" ... I'm thinking of changing it to the "hoodlum" on World Cup Stadium Security (3314). This to keep up with the "troublesome behavior" as displayed in (...) (23 years ago, 30-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Train 2 catch phrase
|
| (...) photoshop my ASK. that GREAT photo was taken with a cannon power shop 300-a AND the software was a quality MS product called PAINT! BTW it is 1:30 Am and i just got e-mail from BRUCE, and I saw a post from Matt, Why are we all still up??? (...) (23 years ago, 30-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
