Subject:
|
Re: robots, not trains
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Thu, 31 May 2001 13:21:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
450 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Rob Stehlik writes:
> Hi everyone (but especially the robot people). I thought I would post a
> pretty dumb question that I already know the answer to. But the point is,
> that it is a robotics question, and we are seldom seeing anything but trains
> here these days... So here it is. Can I start a robot by flipping a polarity
> switch? Or do I have to press 'run' on the RCX? Also, just curious, is
> anyone going with two RCX's out there? I might have to, but I really don't
> want to. It seems that the programming would get pretty complicated, which I
Well, couldn't you set up a program which watches the sensor port for a
resistance value and when you flip the switch, have it trigger a subroutine?
Have the RCX always running, but only starting your actions when you get the
sensor condition. Chris suggests creating a load with a lamp on the switch.
> don't like. If you can believe it, I have had two RCX's since January, and
> have never used both of them in a project!?
Would you believe I have had a second RIS and never opened it? :)
Calum
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | robots, not trains
|
| Hi everyone (but especially the robot people). I thought I would post a pretty dumb question that I already know the answer to. But the point is, that it is a robotics question, and we are seldom seeing anything but trains here these days... So here (...) (23 years ago, 31-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
