 | | RE: I'm sorry, I laughed when I read this...
|
|
(...) (21 years ago, 7-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: C$ - Code Only
|
|
(...) yes, it was all about the ~game~ within the C$ game. I really wanted to scare you with that bit of info at the last min. (...) you must be SO PROUD of yourself. :) Chris "I stole an opening book off the web." S.H. (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm sorry, I laughed when I read this...
|
|
(...) Hmm. (3 URLs) G. stands for "Good God".) I had fun in OAC, only because I knew that I was a failure from the start. English was even better. I think I got %17. Iain (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm sorry, I laughed when I read this...
|
|
(...) and laugh more ... :) Dave K -Trees are tall. (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm sorry, I laughed when I read this...
|
|
(...) The nuances-- Trees are tall. Small line but everytime I think about it, I laugh all over again... Dave K (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | RE: I'm sorry, I laughed when I read this...
|
|
Me too Dave. Funny thing is - it reads a lot like a combination of Ian and Chris put together... Hmmm. Ralph (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm sorry, I laughed when I read this...
|
|
(...) Thanks for sharing - I read these at work, laughed a little bit, and shared it with a coworker. Then I re-read it slowly, soaking it all in, and we have been laughing out loud for the past 10 minutes. The teacher's comments bring back (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: C$ - Code Only
|
|
(...) I think most people seriously underestimated how hard building the robot would be. The funny thing is, all of rtlToronto's events have the same general premise: Build a robot that does something. Second, if you can make the robot do it well, (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | I'm sorry, I laughed when I read this...
|
|
(URL) laughing... somehow I found those two essays very humourous. dave k (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Elevations for Train 6
|
|
(...) I will definitely get another one of these up soon. Hopefully later today. I don't believe there are any significant changes since the last dinner version. I'd like to do the perimeter modules. However we've kind of left it up to you to fill (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: C$ - Code Only
|
|
(...) NQC compiles not quite C code into LEGO firmware opcodes. You download the .rcx result, and LEGO firmware interprets the program. This makes it slow. QuiteC and brickOS both use H8 native C compilers that spit out H8 assembly code directly. (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Elevations for Train 6
|
|
(...) Is there also a latest rendition of the overall layout? Jeff gave me a sheet at dinner last month but a) din't have it still, and b) has it changed? Are we still doing the 'perimeter modules' encompassing a seating area? The show organizers (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: C$ - Code Only
|
|
(...) Forgive a clueless question here, but is QuiteC different than NotQuiteC? If so where can I learn more about it? Thanks! The oldest mention of the term "QuiteC" I could find on LUGNET was only 3 weeks ago but MAYBE I'm searching wrong? see (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: C$ - Code Only
|
|
(...) Steve, One of the thing I noticed when working on the book generation code, there are typically multiple unique drop sequences that get you to the same board state, even when just picking the best hypothetical moves. In an RCX environment that (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: C$ - Code Only
|
|
(...) Steve, One of the thing I noticed when working on the book generation code, there are typically multiple unique drop sequences that get you to the same board state, even when just picking the best hypothetical moves. In an RCX environment that (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Elevations for Train 6
|
|
(...) I'm thinking that depending on your purity level, because the battery is stationary, it's feasible to do a battery replacement thing where you supply 9V DC to the battery box via contacts that "look" like a battery but have a wire coming out (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: C$ - Code Only
|
|
(...) Steve, I'm obviously curious to undestand what all you packed into your code. Kevin (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: C$ - Code Only
|
|
(...) Steve, I'm obviously curious to undestand what all you packed into your code. Kevin (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: C$ - Code Only
|
|
(...) Folks who read rtlToronto can skip this part. I added it because I'm cross posting to robotics.rcx. For those who don't know, rtlToronto had a contest with robots playing Connect Four. Creating a robot for this is double faceted. Getting (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Elevations for Train 6
|
|
(...) I do plan to get one of these sets eventually. Looks like fun on it's own. I don't know if it would have enough power to pull much of a train though. It's worth experimenting with once I get one. Still battery powered though, so I wouldn't (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
