 | | Re: ashcroft is an ^&^%
|
|
(...) NOPE. rtl, has a purpose, and it serves it well. YES, it is a goofy place. but it also serves to help unite the LUG rtl. Dave, as King, it has always been my dream to be able to plant the new strongbadia flag (as suggested by ross) in fertile (...) (21 years ago, 10-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
|
| |
| | Re: ashcroft is an ^&^%
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.test.foo, Chris Magno wrote: <snip> (...) Thought that was l.o.c.rtltoronto The goof-offiest place on LUGNET! :) (21 years ago, 10-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
|
| |
| | Re: ashcroft is an ^&^%
|
|
(...) .debate is a scary place. I'm not going there. but as a libertarian you can see my point of view. (...) fair enuff. I'm sure todd does not want to be on the wrong end of governmet lawyers. BUT STILL I have valid points. its all about balance. (...) (21 years ago, 10-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
|
| |
| | Re: ashcroft is an ^&^%
|
|
(...) (21 years ago, 10-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
|
| |
| | Re: ashcroft is an ^&^%
|
|
(...) You're preaching to the choir there, Our bill of rights is in tatters already, and I've gotten tossed off jury pools for mentioning FIJ, and picketed in front of courthouses in support of FIJA (the fully informed jury amendment) when I was (...) (21 years ago, 10-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
|
| |
| | Re: Persuant to TOS 8.....
|
|
(...) What moderator? We don't have moderators here. OK, I did not realise that BG links go bad that fast, (and you can only search a few days back near as I can tell) did anyone happen to capture the text or scan the article? If not, then it's gone (...) (21 years ago, 10-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
|
| |
| | Persuant to TOS 8.....
|
|
I submit that the Boston Globe on HSR link is no longer working, so the moderator better get to fixin it.... ROSCO (The views expressed in this post are not those of a sane mind) (21 years ago, 10-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
|
| |
| | ashcroft is an ^&^%
|
|
(...) its YOUR government..... deal with it. You can either stand up to such bull&*#t, and use your slowing eroding constitution, and bill or rights, OR you can be a socialist and let big brother... umm i mean your government protect you. you can (...) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
|
| |
| | Re: flag of Foo
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.test.foo, Larry Pieniazek wrote: <snip> (...) Repetition teaches the donkey What? Repetition teaches the donkey What?? My friend and I have this conversation all the time--it just gets funnier every time... Well... no, not really (...) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
|
| |
| | Re: flag of Foo
|
|
(...) (ToSsed some gibberish) (...) Your sense of proportion is clearly skewed. (...) Nonsense. You can embed all the pics of nude cats you want via FTX and not be in violation of clause 8 (you're possibly in violation of other clauses, but not that (...) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
|
| |
| | Re: flag of Foo
|
|
(...) 01001100011000010111...1100100001 TOS THAT!!!! I was all prepared to let this binary thing die, you flashing chaper 8 really made me mad. (madder than when I laundered my 8480) come on. I'm not going to play lawyer and dig in the munituia of (...) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
|
| |
| | Re: flag of Foo
|
|
(...) satisfactory (to me) resolution of your ToS violation question :-) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
|
| |
| | flag of Foo
|
|
I think the top picture here should be our official flag: (URL) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
|
| |
| | Re: S P A C E ! !
|
|
(...) * L * M * A * O * ! ! ! And I mean I’m REALLY laughing my ass off right now! Ok, ok, I have to stop now; my boss is giving me some odd looks and probably thinks I went loopy. Either way I’m about to get fired :)) Ahhh... that sure was a good (...) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
|
| |
| | Re: S P A C E ! !
|
|
(...) For some reason a plain Copy->Paste does not excite me in the ways it used to... just like mocking Larry – it’s so easy you loose any interest in it pretty fast. And just so you know Chris, there *is* a pretty cool prize for decoding my (...) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
|
| |
| | Re: S P A C E ! !
|
|
(...) You just answered your own question. encoded is not plain text and therefore "non-plain-text content" (...) Not relevant. "including but not limited to" (...) Really, I know you guys are just playing but it's not an appropriate mechanism for (...) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
|
| |
| | Re: S P A C E ! !
|
|
(...) How is the following not plain text? It's encoded, but so are 8-bit posts ('quoted-printable'). It's not binaries, and not created using any binary-to-text utilities - it's just text-to-text conversion. 576520616C6C206B6E6F...4841480A0A (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
|
| |
| | Re: S P A C E ! !
|
|
(...) (snip) (...) (snip) OK guys, knock it off, please... I refer you to point 8 of the Discussion Group ToS: (URL) (do not) Post non-plain-text content such as HTML, multi-part MIME messages, or so-called “binaries” including but not limited to: (...) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
|
| |
| | Re: S P A C E ! !
|
|
(...) 54686520736164207061...697327206D (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
|
| |
| | Re: S P A C E ! !
|
|
(...) 01001011 01101110 01101111 01110111 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01010100 01101111 01100100 01100100 00100111 01110011 01100001 01110100 01110100 01100101 01101110 01110100 01101001 01101111 01101110 00100000 01110100 01101111 01100100 (...) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
|
