| |
In lugnet.off-topic.test.foo, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.test.foo, Dan Boger wrote:
> > I think the top picture here should be our official flag:
> >
> > http://www.ritsumei.ac.jp/~akitaoka/saishin-e.html
>
> Your input has been noted, and filed in the appropriate place, pending
> satisfactory (to me) resolution of your ToS violation question :-)
010011000110000101110010011100100111100100101100001000000111100101101111011101010111001000100000011100110111010101100011011010000010000001100001001000000100010001001001010011100100101100100001
TOS THAT!!!!
I was all prepared to let this binary thing die, you flashing chaper 8 really
made me mad.
(madder than when I laundered my 8480)
come on. I'm not going to play lawyer and dig in the munituia of what Todd
meant by "TOS 8"
we are all smart people. it was put there to stop stupid people from posting
pics of nude cats, and such. NOT to be called on cause you dont want to play
nice in the foo sandbox.
3 paragraphs of 1's and 0's are JUST THAT. easy to read, 1's and 0's.
and I'm NOT going to pester Todd and have him make a "call" on this.
its just not worth it.
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: flag of Foo
|
| (...) (ToSsed some gibberish) (...) Your sense of proportion is clearly skewed. (...) Nonsense. You can embed all the pics of nude cats you want via FTX and not be in violation of clause 8 (you're possibly in violation of other clauses, but not that (...) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
|
Message is in Reply To:
13 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
