| |
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> As to why this matters: LUGNET is not intended to be a haven for coded messages,
> the last thing we need is some of Ashcroft's scurrilous minions examining LUGNET
> content closely to see if the coded messages actually contain harmful things, or
> worse, assuming they do and harassing the owners about it, or putting people
> that use LUGNET under surveillance or some such other nonsense.
its YOUR government..... deal with it. You can either stand up to such bull&*#t,
and use your slowing eroding constitution, and bill or rights, OR you can be a
socialist and let big brother... umm i mean your government protect you.
you can start with fully informed juries.
> Find a different sort of fun guys, this one's worn out. Most jokes don't repeat
> well anyway and this one's had enough reps.
no. this stopped being funny as soon as you threatened with TOS. stop being a TOS
bully/lawyer and just play nice.
as I've said before this would have died a long time ago on its own.
Chris
---------- sig file----------
In order not violate Lugnet TOS this is my ~short~ SIG FILE.
It is NOT intended as a coded message.
Just to cover my butt, I'm adding a link to a FREE page that will translate this to
simple words that any human can read. : http://nickciske.com/tools/binary.php
-------------------------
011000100110111101101101011000100000110100001010
011010100110100101101000011000010110010000100000
011100000111001001100101011100110110100101100100011001010110111001110100
------------------------
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: ashcroft is an ^&^%
|
| (...) You're preaching to the choir there, Our bill of rights is in tatters already, and I've gotten tossed off jury pools for mentioning FIJ, and picketed in front of courthouses in support of FIJA (the fully informed jury amendment) when I was (...) (21 years ago, 10-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: flag of Foo
|
| (...) (ToSsed some gibberish) (...) Your sense of proportion is clearly skewed. (...) Nonsense. You can embed all the pics of nude cats you want via FTX and not be in violation of clause 8 (you're possibly in violation of other clauses, but not that (...) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
