| |
In lugnet.off-topic.test.foo, Chris Magno wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.test.foo, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.test.foo, Dan Boger wrote:
> > > I think the top picture here should be our official flag:
> > >
> > > http://www.ritsumei.ac.jp/~akitaoka/saishin-e.html
> >
> > Your input has been noted, and filed in the appropriate place, pending
> > satisfactory (to me) resolution of your ToS violation question :-)
(ToSsed some gibberish)
> I was all prepared to let this binary thing die, you flashing chaper 8 really
> made me mad.
>
> (madder than when I laundered my 8480)
Your sense of proportion is clearly skewed.
> come on. I'm not going to play lawyer and dig in the munituia of what Todd
> meant by "TOS 8"
>
> we are all smart people. it was put there to stop stupid people from posting
> pics of nude cats, and such.
Nonsense. You can embed all the pics of nude cats you want via FTX and not be in
violation of clause 8 (you're possibly in violation of other clauses, but not
that one)
> NOT to be called on cause you dont want to play
> nice in the foo sandbox.
Nonsense again.
> 3 paragraphs of 1's and 0's are JUST THAT. easy to read, 1's and 0's.
Nonsense.
> and I'm NOT going to pester Todd and have him make a "call" on this.
>
> its just not worth it.
I've stated my opinion, you're free to agree or disagree, but it *is* a ToS
violation in my opinion, and you can't get around that. If you *keep* posting
stuff (in non foreign language groups) that can't be read by all group
participants, I *will* call you on it, because it IS against the ToS to do that,
in my opinion, and I will ask Todd to decide.
As to why this matters: LUGNET is not intended to be a haven for coded messages,
the last thing we need is some of Ashcroft's scurrilous minions examining LUGNET
content closely to see if the coded messages actually contain harmful things, or
worse, assuming they do and harassing the owners about it, or putting people
that use LUGNET under surveillance or some such other nonsense.
Find a different sort of fun guys, this one's worn out. Most jokes don't repeat
well anyway and this one's had enough reps.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: flag of Foo
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.test.foo, Larry Pieniazek wrote: <snip> (...) Repetition teaches the donkey What? Repetition teaches the donkey What?? My friend and I have this conversation all the time--it just gets funnier every time... Well... no, not really (...) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
| | | ashcroft is an ^&^%
|
| (...) its YOUR government..... deal with it. You can either stand up to such bull&*#t, and use your slowing eroding constitution, and bill or rights, OR you can be a socialist and let big brother... umm i mean your government protect you. you can (...) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: flag of Foo
|
| (...) 01001100011000010111...1100100001 TOS THAT!!!! I was all prepared to let this binary thing die, you flashing chaper 8 really made me mad. (madder than when I laundered my 8480) come on. I'm not going to play lawyer and dig in the munituia of (...) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
