 | | Re: My pun of the Weak...
|
|
(...) And I see for some people this topic it's hobbit forming. *Mike waits for the Smaug to clear on this one* --Mike. (27 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: My pun of the Weak...
|
|
(...) Stop it guys! These puns are mordor! Cheers, - jsproat (27 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: My pun of the Weak...
|
|
(...) That's my favorite song! 'Course, I'm a hobbitual liar. -John (...) (27 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: My pun of the Weak...
|
|
(...) You really think I wood? -John (27 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: My pun of the Weak...
|
|
(...) I'm thinking something more along the lines of "Saruman Chanted Evening". Cheers, - jsproat (27 years ago, 21-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: My pun of the Weak...
|
|
(...) "Spamlog roasting on an open fire, Jack Frost picking at your nose..." (...) Careful, might make an ash of yourself. -Tom McD. when replying, it's been rumored that spamcake sledgehammers were used in the destruction of the Berlin wall. (27 years ago, 21-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: My pun of the Weak...
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.pun, Jeff Stembel openly admits to writing: (...) You must have appundecitis! (...) <whap> Well, with us you know you don't have to submit a pun for that! :-) <whap><shlubble>(which is the sound of a spamlog hitting a maniac's (...) (27 years ago, 21-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: My pun of the Weak...
|
|
(...) Who said anything about a) "virtual" as opposed to real, and 2) "wiffle" as opposed to C405 double-wall Aluminum;-) [1] As far as the spamlog goes, I'll let you know after my wife throws another one on the fire and tells me something she's (...) (27 years ago, 21-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | My pun of the Weak...
|
|
Here is my pun of the Weak (willed)! With apologies to J.R.R. Tolkein, of course. Anyways, on with the Punning! "Onion ring to rule them all; onion ring to find them. Onion ring to keep them all, and in the darkness fry them!" Jeff P.S. Sorry (...) (27 years ago, 21-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: spamcake collection
|
|
The almighty Todd tolde us: (...) Sounds like quite a challenging problem in its extreme... :) Since there are only about 350 of 'em, and editing will probably be necessary on most of 'em anyway, I'll bet it's quicker just to pop the whole thing (...) (27 years ago, 17-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: spamcake collection
|
|
(...) True -- I knowingly didn't take that into consideration. Yet. This should be fairly easy to fix -- just buffer all text after the signature /\bTom McD\b/ but before a ( blank line or a quoted line or a header line ) and grep that for "spam". (...) (27 years ago, 17-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: spamcake collection
|
|
(...) That's what I was planning on doing. I can also delete lousier or message- content-reliant ones at the same time, as the latter don't stand by themselves for use in any old message. But I wasn't about to discourage anyone if they could do it. (...) (27 years ago, 17-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: spamcake collection
|
|
<378FBF59.7B8E83D0@io.com> <FEznMB.K5z@lugnet.com> <FEzo55.KyI@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) For the sample set we have now. But what if EVERYONE starts doing the 'cake thing. This is (...) (27 years ago, 17-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: spamcake collection
|
|
(...) Sounds like quite a challenging problem in its extreme... :) Since there are only about 350 of 'em, and editing will probably be necessary on most of 'em anyway, I'll bet it's quicker just to pop the whole thing into an editor and delete stuff (...) (27 years ago, 17-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: spamcake collection
|
|
That algorithm won't find the following (because "spamcake" appears two lines later not one line later): (URL) the following (because "spamcake" appears in the rare alternate form "spampucks"): (URL) like to also point out that you aren't matching (...) (27 years ago, 17-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: spamcake collection
|
|
(...) <FEzKnJ.F9n@lugnet.com> (...) What about a footnote? I've used those too. Usually they are formatted, "(1) foo blah glorp". (...) download (...) I'm (...) Forget my pandering. Doesn't have to be free. (...) That would work. (...) I don't do (...) (27 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: spamcake collection
|
|
<FEzILx.C5I@lugnet.com> <378FB99F.F46CAB87@io.com> <FEzKnJ.F9n@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) Hardly any at all with the latest incantation. (1) (...) This is basically my strategy. I'm (...) (27 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: spamcake collection
|
|
(...) Writing (...) part (...) and (...) <snipped code> How much? too much to throw out manually? Hmm (with an empty stare). Consider that spamcake directives never have parentheses surrounding them (but I've put some parenthetical lines after my (...) (27 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: spamcake collection
|
|
(...) If Perl is the code of refreshment, swig on! :-, I'm not sure this will get all of them. It does introduce some non-sig text. BREAKAGE: while( $lineIn = <STDIN> ) { if( $lineIn =~ m/\bTom McD\b/ ) { while( $msgIn = <STDIN> ) { if( $msgIn =~ (...) (27 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: spamcake collection
|
|
(...) of (...) You'll need a swig while doing it ;-) (...) Thanks! My mailbox is too full of junk to hold it so an ftp worked out great. (...) -Tom McD. when replying, stay away from the *pure* spamcake stuff... (27 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
