Geeking : 432


Off-Topic / Geek / 432	431 \| 433

Subject:	Re: OID generation (was: Re: wishing upon a star)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.geek
Date:	Thu, 26 Aug 1999 20:44:12 GMT
Viewed:	629 times

In lugnet.db.brictionary, Todd Lehman writes: > [...] or are there more robust methods for generating OIDs? (Let's > assume WoLOG that 2^32 is a sufficient maximum number of OIDs; it > could just as well be 48 or 64 bits.) Just to save others the effort -- "wolog" occurs 3 times on Hotbot and 28 times in Alta Vista. The best interpretation in this context appears to be an abbreviation for "without loss of generality". - Robert Munafo http://www.mrob.com/ LEGO: TC+++(8480) SW++ #+ S-- LS++ Hsp M+ A@ LM++ YB64m IC13

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: OID generation (was: Re: wishing upon a star)
(...) If you didn't already know that.... you have to ask yourself... do you feel lucky? huh, do ya? ... <slap> whoops. wrong thread. you have to ask yourself, are you geeky enough to be on this group? <grins, ducks and runs> (25 years ago, 26-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)

Message is in Reply To:

		OID generation (was: Re: wishing upon a star)
(...) Lar, I've been experimenting with a method for OID construction which takes a pseudorandom 32-bit integer, converts it to a 40-bit integer by adding 8 bits of CRC, then converts that an to 8-byte base-32 ASCII representation using the 32 (...) (25 years ago, 26-Aug-99, to lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.off-topic.geek)

22 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search