Subject:
|
Re: wishing upon a star
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.db.brictionary
|
Date:
|
Thu, 26 Aug 1999 22:13:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1825 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.db.brictionary, Dave Lovelace writes:
> After reading further replies to my Lugnet posting, I am convinced that I
> should just sit back and watch the show from now on, with apologies for any
> interruption...you are all truly brilliant, and obviously experienced,
> thinkers...
Not so fast, my humble friend...
Just because it isn't used as the database key or as the "unique definitive"
part number doesn't mean your part numbers have no merit.
I supported your suggestion because I felt it was appropriate to include a
system like yours among the available optional alternate part numbers.
I already use four part numbering systems in my own database with no problem
(genuine LEGO numbers, LDraw numbers, patent numbers, and my own numbers when
the others are unavailable, inconvenient or ambiguous) and I anticipate the
people in this group will end up using 4 or 5 more. I plan to add them all to
my database if and when they are available.
- Robert Munafo http://www.mrob.com/
LEGO: TC+++(8480) SW++ #+ S-- LS++ Hsp M+ A@ LM++ YB64m IC13
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: wishing upon a star
|
| (...) Thank you for the kind words, John...and the insights. I am a two-month old "newbie" and have very little to offer gods of thinking such as yourself, and also of course the other geniuses involved in this discussion, other than simple hero (...) (25 years ago, 26-Aug-99, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
