Subject:
|
Re: wishing upon a star
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.db.brictionary
|
Date:
|
Wed, 25 Aug 1999 21:20:13 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@/SayNoToSpam/novera.com
|
Viewed:
|
2256 times
|
| |
|
|
Frank Filz wrote:
> Taking that to the ultimate suggests even the TLG part number should not
> be the key (which of course is already a known issue if you want to
> account for color and/or printing).
Precisely. It's not guaranteed to be unique and it has business meaning.
Now, clearly, the underlying DB implementation should index on that
column because we are likely to be doing a lot of lookups, but that is
an optimization/implementation issue, not a design issue.
You're pretty bright for an IBMer. (ex IBMer grins, ducks and runs)
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ Member ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to
lugnet.
NOTE: I have left CTP, effective 18 June 99, and my CTP email
will not work after then. Please switch to my Novera ID.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: wishing upon a star
|
| (...) It's known to be not unique, there's a many-to-many relationship between TLG numbers and unique mold-forms. That is, the same number has been used for different parts (at least, different versions of parts), and different numbers have been (...) (25 years ago, 26-Aug-99, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: wishing upon a star
|
| (...) Taking that to the ultimate suggests even the TLG part number should not be the key (which of course is already a known issue if you want to account for color and/or printing). (25 years ago, 25-Aug-99, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
