 | | Re: Free PHP and MySQL hosting
|
|
(...) Do your own. Seriously, it doesn't exist. You might (if you look hard enough) find a site that claims to, but you'll be lucky if you can see any of your own site through all the ads. Other than that, you'll have to pay. Rates are pretty low (...) (22 years ago, 14-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Free PHP and MySQL hosting
|
|
Hi all, What would be the best solution for free PHP and MySQL hosting? Tnx. Jaco (22 years ago, 11-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Retina scanner?
|
|
(...) Indeed, the situation lens itself to goofy humours. Maybe the media thought that the pun was cornea than they could handle, and they were afraid to sclera 'way their readership, or perhaps that some reader might have retinal letter to the (...) (22 years ago, 8-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Retina scanner?
|
|
(...) That's more like it. Though I'm not sure about the "most mathematically unique biometric" bit. If it's so amazing, and it's obviously easy to capture the image, why isn't it more widely used? I remember reading about a UK school that (...) (22 years ago, 8-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Retina scanner?
|
|
(...) Iris Recognition Camera: (URL) PS: toppostbad. (22 years ago, 8-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Retina scanner?
|
|
(...) Well, call it an 'eyeball scanner' or something. I suppose I could equally come down on someone who's made a hotdog stand that doesn't really cook hotdogs, or a minifig Outside Broadcast Unit that doesn't really take live video (oh wait a (...) (22 years ago, 7-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Retina scanner?
|
|
Okay, you made a point. It should be called "cornea photographer" or something like that. Robert Seifert (but still, isn't it good approximation? I mean it's still lego, you cannot expect something such sophisticated as retina scanner. That was what (...) (22 years ago, 6-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Retina scanner?
|
|
(...) You can call it nitpicking if you ignore the implications, but it's like saying you've built a fingerprint scanner when what you're actually doing is photographing the _back_ of someone's hand. From a few basic measurements of the image, you (...) (22 years ago, 2-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Retina scanner?
|
|
(...) You're right! But, in fact, who cares? I mean, it's kind of nitpicking. In my opinion it's more important if it works or not. Okay, now when I think about it, does it work? Isn't cornea every time little bit different due different light (...) (22 years ago, 2-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: math question (or pattern... whatever...)
|
|
(...) "Performing these experiments not only gives you some clues, it also slows you down from the common frenzy of everyday life, so you can focus on just one thing for a period of time." ROSCO (22 years ago, 2-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: math question (or pattern... whatever...)
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Larry Pieniazek writes: Another site I happened to stumble across (which is so chock full of math gadgets and java applets that I added it to the header...): (URL) this writeup of the problem, along with a simulator for you (...) (22 years ago, 2-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Judge Kotelly Admits Error, Will Create New Ruling with Judge Jackson
|
|
(...) Ouch. I haven't had those Win2K horror stories. I got a mouse that hangs, and really slow access to the file system. I need to re-format and reinstall on this Dell Inspiron 8100, and upgrade the desktop. (...) I like 2k a lot better. I just (...) (22 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Judge Kotelly Admits Error, Will Create New Ruling with Judge Jackson
|
|
(...) MS burns me to no end-- Win2K on Toshiba 3000 laptop--netmeeting causes BSOD! Beyond that, I finally get laptop just the way I want it (Diablo II, EQ, and Mindstorms/NQC, as well as business apps...) and the DVD Video overlay gets corrupted. (...) (22 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Judge Kotelly Admits Error, Will Create New Ruling with Judge Jackson
|
|
(...) I'm not too happy with the current installation of Win2K I'm running. But, I'm a bit busy to do something about that right now :( Once I no longer need the secondary machine for rendering (got a feeling that will be never, but I'll have to (...) (22 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Judge Kotelly Admits Error, Will Create New Ruling with Judge Jackson
|
|
(...) I thought maybe you were having a bad MS day ;-) (22 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Judge Kotelly Admits Error, Will Create New Ruling with Judge Jackson
|
|
(...) I know what day it is, read what I wrote at the bottom of the post :-) -Tim (22 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Judge Kotelly Admits Error, Will Create New Ruling with Judge Jackson
|
|
(...) What day is it? (22 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Judge Kotelly Admits Error, Will Create New Ruling with Judge Jackson
|
|
Just read this.... wow. (URL) from the page above) April 1, 2003 BROADCAST TRANSCRIPT: "U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, who oversaw the settlement between Microsoft and the U.S. Department of Justice, issued a formal statement to the (...) (22 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | serious vulnerability present. all doomed. over.
|
|
This was funny, coming from a well respected moderated vulnerability list :) FUT to off-topic.debate, if you want to talk about the contents :) ----- Forwarded message from "Security Experts, Liability Limited" <throwaway@dione.ids.pl> ----- (...) (22 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: On a scale of 0 to 10?
|
|
(...) I don't see an easy way to do this. I tried substituting x=e^B Then I get a polynomial of degree 5. Only the positive roots lead to real values of B. (since e^any real number > 0) This is solvable, but very difficult to do by hand, especially (...) (22 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
