Subject:
|
Re: Retina scanner?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 09:34:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
450 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Jason J. Railton writes:
> You do realise that that 'retina' scanner on CLSOTW is actually just
> photographing the cornea, not the retina, don't you?
>
> Jason Railton
You're right!
But, in fact, who cares? I mean, it's kind of nitpicking. In my opinion it's
more important if it works or not. Okay, now when I think about it, does it
work? Isn't cornea every time little bit different due different light
conditions and so on? Any suggestions?
Robert
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Retina scanner?
|
| (...) You can call it nitpicking if you ignore the implications, but it's like saying you've built a fingerprint scanner when what you're actually doing is photographing the _back_ of someone's hand. From a few basic measurements of the image, you (...) (21 years ago, 2-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Retina scanner?
|
| You do realise that that 'retina' scanner on CLSOTW is actually just photographing the cornea, not the retina, don't you? Jason Railton (22 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
