 | | Re: Anyone used AutoPlay Menu Studio ?
|
|
(...) See, there's your problem. You work for people who think that "professional" equals "snazzy" and "graphics! Ooh, Shiny! Button-click! Click! Click!". Myself, I go for the "Ka-*Click*" style of dealing with those people, at least in my dreams.. (...) (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Anyone used AutoPlay Menu Studio ?
|
|
(...) Yeah, that works, but for what I'm being paid and considering this is for a CD they'll be sending out to thousands of potential customers, I think something a wee bit more professional and snazzy is called for. :) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Another MCSE test down!
|
|
(...) Yeah, I think I took all of 20 minutes for the Workstation test. And if I hadn't forced myself to reread each question twice with my hands off the mouse I probably could have finished it in 10. I'll do TCP/IP after Net Ess, then Proxy to (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Anyone used AutoPlay Menu Studio ?
|
|
(...) COMMAND.COM AUTOEXEC.BAT MENU.BAT CHOICE.COM A.BAT B.BAT C.BAT Q.BAT X.BAT [...] Hey, worked for me... Jasper (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Another MCSE test down!
|
|
(...) When Microsoft ends. I'm not sure whether I want that to be soon or in a decade or two... MS has driven hardware development _hard_ over the past 5 years. They've also made computers from a business tool to a home appliance [faster than it (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Another MCSE test down!
|
|
(...) You are on the downhill slide now! TCP/IP is a good workout, its the only test that I was anywhere close to using up all of my time on. Mostly due to rechecking my math on subnet addressing. Net essentials and IIS are pretty much slam dunks. (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Another MCSE test down!
|
|
(...) 3 up, 3 down. Had a work crisis interfere with taking Net Essentials over the last week - going to try to take it next week. So far I've passed Sever, Enterprise, Workstation. Scores don't matter, but I was close to perfect on all of them. (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Mini, Micro, Maxi, Macro, Kilo, etc. (was: Re: Pink spaceship)
|
|
(...) Not necessarily. Some harddrives think a kilobyte is 10^3, and a megabyte is 10^6, and a gigabyte is 10^9. Some harddrives think a kilbyte is 2^10, a megabyte is 2^20, and a gigabyte is 10^3 * 2^20. Others think a gigabyte is 2^30. Endless (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Another MCSE test down!
|
|
(...) So, how far are you now? I've had a four book set of the core exams in my collection for a while now, but the whole allergy-to-printing-ink thing sorta put a big damper on that. Here's to hoping that air-tight forced-air-circulation box I'm (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Need info on "#include" tag in HTML
|
|
(...) This is not an HTML tag, but rather an SSI (server side includes) directive. Well, the "<!-- -->" part is the HTML "comment" tag. But the #include part isn't. It goes something like this: <!--#include virtual="myfile.html" --> It seems like an (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Need info on "#include" tag in HTML
|
|
keyed "altavista" into browser url window... keyed "what about the html tag include" into search window about a million matches... number two was (URL) time <30 seconds, I love altavista :?) bishop Franklin W. Cain wrote in message ... (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: The Pleiades
|
|
(...) Build your own, join the ATM community! My 8" mirror is coming along nicely... Jasper (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: MSIE5 security hole
|
|
(...) Sure glad I choose my family members better - and i certainly choose which of them I hand my email address to. If they're clued enough that I want to talk to them, they can damn well go to Dejanews^H^H^H^H. About the browser thingies: (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Need info on "#include" tag in HTML
|
|
Help! I need info on the "#include" tag (supposedly used to incorporate a separately stored "fragment" of common or repeated HTML code into multiple files). What I (vaguely) remember is: <!-- #include "my_fragment.h" --> Thanks in advance. Franklin (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Anyone used AutoPlay Menu Studio ?
|
|
Well, I'm working on a little project for a local ISP and I need a good, professional-looking autorun menu-type thing. I'm no coder, so I can't just whip up my own (actually, I did whip up my own with the help of a friend on Friday in VB, but it's (...) (25 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | bad microsoft, bad.
|
|
yay! (25 years ago, 6-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: web design (was Re: Scout secrets revealed)
|
|
(...) Good point. It all depends on how often the nav bar stuff is going to be used. I can imagine some sites/types of content where you're going to want to always have the navigation stuff handy. For others, it's in the way most of the time. One (...) (25 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: web design (was Re: Scout secrets revealed)
|
|
(...) up (...) Yes, but that's the difference between doing it with frames and doing it without. Put the navigation stuff in a frame across the top of the browser, and suddenly, when you scroll down the page you're reading, the navigation frame (...) (25 years ago, 3-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | web design (was Re: Scout secrets revealed)
|
|
(...) Not true, Eric. It's too bad so few web designers get confused by this. The navigation stuff only takes up space if it is currently scrolled into view. Any long message on LUGNET serves as a good example. Visit: (URL) is a set inventory). See (...) (25 years ago, 3-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Ed Boxer Goes to Enfiled - reformatted and updated
|
|
Steve: (...) There is nothing in the HTML specification that prevents this (AFAIR). It is just like the "BANNER" element - nobody cares to implement it. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- (25 years ago, 3-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
