 | | Re: X server for windows
|
|
(...) si. danke schon. (24 years ago, 2-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: X server for windows
|
|
(...) there... is this better? (24 years ago, 2-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: X server for windows
|
|
(...) doh! I had it working correctly, must have broken it someplace... that's what I get when I don't read through the web interface anymore.... I'll work on it right away! Dan (24 years ago, 2-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: X server for windows
|
|
(...) Even then, I've got some bones to pick. :) The bit about the client server terminology, for example -- sure, it's a bit confusing, but their explanation is worse. (24 years ago, 2-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: X server for windows
|
|
(...) I suspect it was when it was written. There is a reference to X11R4 being the latest rev near the end of the piece. (24 years ago, 2-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Putting streaming news client on Sourceforge
|
|
...But I gotta come up with a better (i.e. shorter) name for it! :-, Actually, my biggest hurdle is getting CVS to talk to Sourceforge's CVS server over SSH. With other servers, I could tunnel port 2401 to the CVS server, then point the CVS client (...) (24 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: X server for windows
|
|
(...) Since we're in .ot.geek, and since I see you've upped your rev to 0.9, when are you going to add References to your headers so your messages will thread properly? ;-) (24 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Ripping Vinyl to Digital
|
|
I know, replying to myself and all... (URL) I'm pleased to announce that Compaq has made a "Software Developer's Kit" available for the PJB-100. It's a response to numerous queries and questions about how the PJB works and most specifically, when (...) (24 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: X server for windows
|
|
(...) Kinda funny. Not particularly _accurate_ though. (24 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: X server for windows
|
|
(...) :) Dan (24 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: X server for windows
|
|
see (URL) (24 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Seeking Assistance: HTML coding: Adjusting Size of Target Window
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Kevin Salm writes: <snipped> (...) same window. window.open(url, name, features, replace) url- the url to display in the window name - the name of the window used to 'target' new urls to. features - a string in which a lot (...) (24 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Seeking Assistance: HTML coding: Adjusting Size of Target Window
|
|
Assistance Wanted: Adjusting size of Target window for External image viewer. Note: I am an HTML novice. Would like help with creating external image windows. Here is what I would like to do: - Use lDraw Partsref for individual part reference (...) (24 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: The Law of Falling Lego
|
|
(...) Hehe... it doesn't matter :-) -Shiri (yes, I know that's not physics-wise possible... but we already agreed that lego bricks don't obey the physics rules! :-) (24 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: The Law of Falling Lego
|
|
(...) On what surface? Linoleum? Hardwood? Carpet? (What kind of carpet?) (24 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: The Law of Falling Lego
|
|
(...) Very nice observation, Bill! Although I'm afraid I don't know enough about artificial intelligence or the paranormal to offer any hypotheses of any value, this is a very close relative of a theory that I've held for years: After a dropped Lego (...) (24 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: I think my modems fried! opinions wanted....
|
|
(...) Those are both possible. (24 years ago, 30-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | I think my modems fried! opinions wanted....
|
|
Maybe someone can help me decide what to do.... Here's what happened. Today I was online and one of those quick thunder/lightning storms came up. I saw a flash of lightning so bright it almost blinded me through the blinds, and a crack of thunder (...) (24 years ago, 30-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Recreational vehicles and more questions about the US
|
|
(...) Most places use a weight rating of somewhere around 20000 pounds (the max the vehicle can carry, not the actual weight of the vehicle). If a truck has air brakes, that usually means you need the special license. (...) That is a different (...) (24 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Recreational vehicles and more questions about the US
|
|
(...) Perhaps it is related to the number of seats? That would sound reasonable. At home, one can drive a fairly large vehicle with a normal license. But once the number of seats exceed 6 (or something similar), you'll need a special "light bus" (...) (24 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
