 | | GUI LUGNET streaming news client in Java (Was: Pseudo-streaming live news (was: Re: Monitor Page))
|
|
[reposting and crossposting to .geek to get a wider audience] [f-ups to .geek] (...) (URL) the source: (URL) - The very first update takes the latest avid.cgi message number and subtracts 20 from it and starts reading messages based on *that*, (...) (25 years ago, 25-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek) !
|
| |
| | Wanna see a movie of an asteroid?
|
|
(URL) images were taken by the NEAR probe orbiting the asteroid Eros. It's kinda eerie, watching an animation of a rock a quarter-bilion miles away. :-, Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek) !
|
| |
| | Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer
|
|
(...) Yeah, it does. Thanks. So what that probably means is that within a year or so we'll have a version of mozilla that ultra-geeks know and love, maybe within 5 years we'll get some media hype, then we'll see normal people move over to it, some (...) (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer
|
|
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000 20:29:30 GMT Mike Stanley <cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com> wrote concerning 'Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer': (...) I think you're misunderstanding the point. Mozilla (the browser Todd is referring to) is _not_ written or sold by (...) (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer
|
|
(...) You repeat this over and over again, as if simply stating it will somehow make it more obvious and more true. Mozilla may turn out to be more than a browser. But who is making it? (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer
|
|
(...) Okay, my bad. It looks like it does support sftp; it just doesn't call it that. Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: X server for windows
|
|
(...) I would try to do so. Mine worked like a champ very first time, though, so I don't know how great I would be in helping to diagnose your situation. BTW, the verion I'm using won't tell me a version number (arg >:-P spit fume), but it was (...) (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: X server for windows
|
|
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000 16:52:50 GMT "Sproaticus" <jsproat@io.com> wrote concerning 'Re: X server for windows': (...) since we're talking about my wife's computer, it has the LanWorkplacePro installed there... I tried to use it's X but it wouldn't (...) (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: X server for windows
|
|
(...) Yes indeed. (URL) Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org Quotes 'R' Us ---> (URL) (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: X server for windows
|
|
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000 05:38:15 GMT mattdm@mattdm.org (Matthew Miller) wrote concerning 'Re: X server for windows': (...) cool - that sounds like it might do the trick... have any how-to's off-hand? :) Dan (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: X server for windows
|
|
(...) (URL) that I haven't actually tried that yet (still waiting for my DSL line so I don't have to X over a *!@#^& 33.6 modem.) I'm currently using Novell's Lan Workplace Pro which has a very decent X server in the package. ...Why won't vim work (...) (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer
|
|
(...) I believe that because I believe Mozilla that will, in the long run (if it hasn't already), attract better and more dedicated programmers, designers, and testers to work on it than MSIE. (...) Mozilla != Netscape (...) Mozilla != Netscape (...) (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: summaries on main page
|
|
(...) Wait, your messages have demarcation between when you're lying and when you're telling the truth? What ASCII character code is that? I want to be able to tell too! ++Lar (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer
|
|
(...) I'm really curious as to why you believe that. Really. If Netscape were interested in or capable of producing an IE-killer browser, why haven't they done it already? Given the almost universally agreed-upon crappiness of Communicator 4.7 what (...) (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: X server for windows
|
|
(...) Different than that. You can use SSH to set up "poor man's vpn". I'm too tired to think hard about it right now :) but the end result is your computer thinks it has a new network interface with an IP address on a private (10.x.x.x) network. (...) (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: X server for windows
|
|
(...) I have VNC set up, and I use it sometimes - but transferring 1600x1200 on a 56K, even over a compressed SSH is too slow for comfort... :/ (...) 56K - I've used X over 33k before, and it was better than vnc - still less data transferred, I (...) (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: X server for windows
|
|
(...) Xwin32 is free for 2 hours of use per session. There's another one called something like M/X, but if I remember right, it's not as good. You could also use VNC.... How fast is your network connection? If it's less than 1.5MB both ways, I'd not (...) (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | X server for windows
|
|
Hey geeks :) Anyone know of a free X server for windows I could use? I really want to be able to edit stuff off my work computer at home, but it's so hard without VIM/Emacs... Or, another option, instead of an x server, anyone ever tried to forward (...) (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Which Linux?
|
|
(...) Good for you. :) (...) Well, this of course can be a very religious debate. But here's my opinions: I really like Red Hat -- that's my recommendation for where to start. Once you feel more comfortable, you may want to try out Debian. You may (...) (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Which Linux?
|
|
(...) well, I'm biased, but the only dist I've any experience with is Redhat... If you have background in unix, you should be fine figuring out RH... (...) definitely possible to have both win98/linux installed on the same comp, and to do that you (...) (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
