 | | Re: All your phenomenon are belong to us
|
|
(...) Yep (URL) these people have way too much spare time... ROSCO (24 years ago, 31-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | All your phenomenon are belong to us
|
|
Somebody set up us the site! www.amiallyourbaseornot.com :-) -Tim (24 years ago, 31-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Honestly, I can't leave you kids alone for a second!!
|
|
Well, that was an interesting trip... Since this thread only has 51 messages, and since I just happen to like the number 52... :-P Anyway, just got back from Scotland (no, really) and boy is the engine in my LEGO spaceship I whipped up for the trip (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Winux 2004 shirt on sluggy.com
|
|
(...) I have been very busy with work (my department with >700 employees is being outsourced and I have the responsability to track all our equipment in a little database I have made), I have had my livingroom flooded by a burst radiator pipe, a (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Winux 2004 shirt on sluggy.com
|
|
Oh, Jude, you're just horrible. <grin> BTW, I missed you while you were gone (where to?). No one to tease me and Chris after every post I make! ;-) To reply to your posts: (...) Umm, yeah, you know how it's like, slang changes, and old geizers like (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Winux 2004 shirt on sluggy.com
|
|
(...) I actually have two replies to this post... ---...--- So... that's what the kids are calling it these days... <grin> Jude ---...--- OR ---...--- Is that true Chris? Jude FUT o-t.fun (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Xenogears Sequel?
|
|
Well, there have been rumors since many of the people who originally worked on Xenogears joined a Namco subsidiary (Monolith Soft), and now it looks like those rumors may very well be true: (URL) me tell you, I am *so* looking forward to it! :) (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC 1966 Chevelle
|
|
"J.D. Forinash" <foxtrot@cc.gatech.edu> wrote in message news:9a24pt$u5j$1@an...net.foo... <snip> (...) backward (...) </snip> Overhere we're pretty much metric (*), but we still do the same trick. It's just kilometers per liter. My 1.4 Volvo is (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Mecha haiku (Was Re: huge japanese page of small mecha)
|
|
what a wonderful concept, haiku, mecha, lego... *orgasm* (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Mecha haiku (Was Re: huge japanese page of small mecha)
|
|
(...) Gleefully ignore Gravity like the cherry blossom on the wind :^D ~1st Lieutenant, Fleebnork Division Muffin Head (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Straight Roundness (was Re: Does God have a name for God?)
|
|
(...) Hmm. I guess it depends on how rigid the spinning object is, and what you're using as a standard of comparison. If there's no actual axis, but a "net" axis, the rotation might change. Intesting. Dave! (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Straight Roundness (was Re: Does God have a name for God?)
|
|
(...) But when it wobbles would the axis change? I guess the easiest way to test the theory would be to draw a bright red line along the equator of a globe and give the ol girl a good spin and then see if the line stays the same or blurs whilst it's (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC 1966 Chevelle
|
|
(...) I think it must have been a small tank. :-) (and therefore one that wouldn't do well in a wreck with a bigger tank, but I digress) IIRC, an M1A1 gets about 3 gallons (of Jet A to run its turbines, I think it is) per mile... ++Lar (who drives a (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC 1966 Chevelle
|
|
(...) People joke that way about the cars I've owned, a 1970 Olds Cutlass, a 1981 Chevrolet Suburban, a 1970 Plymouth Fury, a 1999 Dodge Dakota R/T, and a 1969 Dodge Coronet. Hey, they think it's amusing. Me, I know that except in one case, I had (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC 1966 Chevelle
|
|
(...) Hehe. Once back many years ago, I looked up to see if tanks got miles per gallon or gallons per mile. I forget which tank I actually looked up, but it still got miles per gallon, but just barely... :-) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: new stuff for 2001
|
|
Christian Gemuenden <xtian@brickmaster.de> wrote in message news:GAy1Ip.K1y@lugnet.com... (...) would (...) It looks pretty real to me. Where did you get the image from? Huw (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Offtopic .. outgassing
|
|
(...) Like comp.sys.sinclair out on usenet has a large number of Andys? (Really like anyone here would understand that! Ed.) Alex (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC 1966 Chevelle
|
|
(...) You say that like it's a bad thing.... -JDF (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC 1966 Chevelle
|
|
(...) Yep. The cash difference between 5000 USD for a reasonably good example of mid 60's muscle and 50,000 USD for a reasonably good example of a mid 60's eurosupercar (and I am being optimistic) will buy you a heck of a lot of gasoline... So ya. (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC 1966 Chevelle
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:GAxG1H.HCz@lugnet.com... <snip> although eurosupercars are cool, '60s american muscle is cooler.... Safer, (felt) faster, way cheaper, way easier to work on, and way more (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
