Subject:
|
Re: MOC 1966 Chevelle
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Thu, 29 Mar 2001 20:23:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
241 times
|
| |
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message
news:GAxG1H.HCz@lugnet.com...
<snip>
although eurosupercars are cool, '60s american muscle is cooler.... Safer,
(felt) faster, way cheaper, way easier to work on, and way more
rugged/reliable.
</snip>
You mean: bigger, heavier, noisier and burning lots more fuel in their
ridiculously big V8's?
Duq
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: MOC 1966 Chevelle
|
| (...) Yep. The cash difference between 5000 USD for a reasonably good example of mid 60's muscle and 50,000 USD for a reasonably good example of a mid 60's eurosupercar (and I am being optimistic) will buy you a heck of a lot of gasoline... So ya. (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | MOC 1966 Chevelle
|
| I've finally posted pictures of my chevelle on Brickself. (URL) features: Technic V-8 engine with rotating fan, belt driven alternator and power steering pump. Dual exhaust. Full working suspension and steering. Tilt front hood. Reclining seats. (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.announce) !
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
