 | | Re: Official Transcript: Court-martial of Grand Admiral Muffin Head
|
|
(...) Is it just me, or does "Justice Jackson!" sound like a really low-grade comic book hero? James (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: new stuff for 2001
|
|
Larry & All, (...) Indeed. (...) Ah, evil Larry, exploiting poor AFOL's for commercial gain! ; ) Heh heh heh heh (insert maniacial laugh here) I need to get some train creations going, to see what I can come up with. Once I get settled into Indiana. (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: new stuff for 2001
|
|
(...) Dave *Low* posted the fact that the pic was up on BrickSet(tm). :-) So it would be *Low* to spoof us that way, if it was a spoof. :-) (...) You've seen James's work. I have been after him to commercialise the Cascade Talgo, I think it'd make a (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: new stuff for 2001
|
|
(...) That was my point, there's no sense in getting excited about new sets around April 1 anymore (hmm, this is actually a case where it would be more exciting for a TLC employee to make an official announcement instead of a fan, you could believe (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: new stuff for 2001
|
|
To All, Well, I have no clue where this post is going, so anyway, fun is good enough for now. (...) Who knows / cares / anymore. Sheesh. (...) I just threw that out because I saw it was in trains. If it is really in development, cool. If not, oh (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: new stuff for 2001
|
|
(...) That set was (apparently) posted to Brickset!!! Yikes. Is there no institution safe? Huw - Huw more - Humour ... say, maybe not safe after all. I mean, it would be pretty Low to spoof us that way, don't you think? As far as new Amtrak sets? (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm sorry
|
|
"Mark Sandlin" <sandlin@nwlink.com> wrote in message news:B6E42A60.F471%s...ink.com... (...) slowly (...) the (...) Well, you had me fooled - I even posted a "sorry to see you go" reply :| Glad to hear your it was just your body clock that was a (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Pirate ship masts for 6274
|
|
(...) From the "bored at work" department, here's the _only_ google.com reference to "crutch-o-matic": (URL) a rural labour saving device as I had first thought... Crunch-o-matic, on the other hand, was variously: *a piece of exercise equipment *a (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Calling it Quits
|
|
(...) Heck, even though it is a joke, I'd like any fire helmets & makes, air tanks, fire suits and ladders you've got! ;) Steve (24 years ago, 27-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Calling it Quits
|
|
(...) If I jump into a flaming post, and someone jumps on me I am kind of expecting that not everyone is going to be kind. On the other hand if I am empathizing with someone or having a genuine Lego discussion with someone and I get flamed out of no (...) (24 years ago, 27-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Calling it Quits
|
|
(...) I just wanted to add my two cents-- a) I thought this was pretty funny. b) I agree with all those who point out that the problem is not with the initial joke, but with people jumping on each other in the aftermath c) I don't think that this (...) (24 years ago, 27-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: What's in a name?
|
|
From Dictionary.com: Crich·ton (krtn), James. Known as "the Admirable Crichton." 1560-1582. Scottish adventurer, linguist, and scholar whose intellectual achievements were lauded by Aldus Manutius and Thomas Urquhart. He was killed in a brawl. (...) (24 years ago, 27-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Lego Site os the Week?
|
|
(...) Heehee... Which reminds me, to buy the shirt, or not to buy the shirt, that is the question? xpost o-t.fun -Tim (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Calling it Quits
|
|
(...) Mark's joke was a stroke of genius. I read it before anyone had picked up on it. Right away I thought..."wow, that's too bad, It's his creativity that drew me into Lugnet and Brickshelf. If not for his MOCs, I might still be collecting Lego (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Calling it Quits
|
|
(...) suits and ladders you've got! Josh (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Calling it Quits
|
|
So, I suppose I should shelve my plans for a "Gun-weilding teen blames LEGOWars" announcement? -gyug (geeez, just kidding!) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS"
|
|
(...) 8^) There are some who would argue that music for the masses is already free in the form of radio and Napster, but of course the unlicensed redistribution of such music is an breach of copyright. Your supposition of patrons is interesting and (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS"
|
|
(...) I would agree...BUT my fav. concerts to listen to are the ones which I went to...the visions of Sarah singing in LA at Universal Studios, casting a shadow on the opposite wall...and the _music_ from that concert. (No, I am _not_ obsessed :) (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS"
|
|
(...) Yes and no. Cf. the Dead. They made space down front for people who were recording their shows and actively encouraged a very active marketplace in "bootleg" tapes. Which had significant value because every one of their shows were different, (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS"
|
|
(...) Of course my point was that the music that the masses listens to WILL be free. The only question then is how the artists feed themselves. Some will do so by having another job. Others will be supported by rich patrons. I also feel that there (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
