To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 6991
6990  |  6992
Subject: 
Re: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS"
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Mon, 26 Mar 2001 20:20:37 GMT
Viewed: 
379 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Frank Filz writes:

Of course my point was that the music that the masses listens to WILL be
free. The only question then is how the artists feed themselves. Some
will do so by having another job. Others will be supported by rich
patrons. I also feel that there will be a very small amount of art which
is only available to a very tight circle of folks.

  8^)  There are some who would argue that music for the masses is already
free in the form of radio and Napster, but of course the unlicensed
redistribution of such music is an breach of copyright.
  Your supposition of patrons is interesting and nostalgic, but I wonder
what sort of return these patrons would expect for their investments.  Some
might possibly be sufficiently rewarded by the music/musicians themselves,
but others might seek other revenues (to wit, your point below...)

Actually, there is another source of income. Concerts will always be
attractive. I don't think we will EVER lose our fascination with real
physical presence.

  Yeah, that's something I'd overlooked.  I tend to think of these things in
terms of "how would that translate to book publishing," but that's not
always sound.  It's often nice to attend an author's live reading of a work,
but that author's "voice" isn't necessarily vital to the text, so the two
can be separated more easily than a singer's voice from that singer's song.

Another aspect of this of course is that I don't forsee model building ever
being eliminated, even if computer simulations become nearly perfect. Even if
we reach a point where we have so completely understood the brains function
that we can create virtual content which is indistinguishable from the real
thing, a certain number of people will still revel in actually doing the real
thing

  I agree; ultimately we're a hands-on species, even if the nature of
"hands-on" has changed over the centuries.  I think again of books, and the
likelihood that paper-based publishing will persist for quite some time
despite the rise of eBooks et al.

(that's an interesting thing, what happens to society when we reach that
point? It may depend on the actual resources necessary to produce the
simulations).

That's another fun point to ponder.  I suppose this will occur (insofar as
it does occur) on a generational basis, gradually moving society as a whole
(or at least that part of it able to access the simulations) into a less
"real" environment.  I guess we'll see...

     Dave!



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS"
 
(...) Of course my point was that the music that the masses listens to WILL be free. The only question then is how the artists feed themselves. Some will do so by having another job. Others will be supported by rich patrons. I also feel that there (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

13 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR