To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 6347 (-20)
  Re: Santa (Physics, you gotta love it! : ) )
 
Leave it to Larry to spoil all my fun! ; ) (...) Yes Larry, but I thought it was amusing, not for super analysis, not for debating either, hence the fun part? Scott S. -- (25 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Santa (Physics, you gotta love it! : ) )
 
(...) ... to all, and to all a good night! james (25 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Santa (Physics, you gotta love it! : ) )
 
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Scott Edward Sanburn writes: This is an oldie but a goodie (not as good as "is hell endo or exothermic" but a goodie). It has one major flaw though... This assumption: (...) Given population clustering the mean interhouse (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Santa (Physics, you gotta love it! : ) )
 
To All, I thought this was amusing, even though it has LEGO mentioned in it, I don't know if it needs to be here or in .geek or something. Subject: NASA's Notes Concerning Santa IS THERE A SANTA? In the late 1800s a little girl named Virginia asked (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: It finally happened.
 
(...) <snip> Ye Gods, man! What the heck happened? Did you grab a hot pan off the stove or somethin? Yeowch! ~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin (25 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Problems with Christianity
 
(...) Ummmmm, errrrr, of course! I planned it that way - yeah, that's the ticket! It was a subtle commentary on debates about Christianity in general. Glad you caught the wry humor - I wondered if anyone would appreciate it. Bruce _ :-0 (Edvard (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: It finally happened.
 
(...) Actually, this has happened once before, believe it or not. Four years ago. I didn't have a digital camera back then, so I couldn't document it. We do have some "real" photos though. Those ones are pretty nasty. I don't think I want to show (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: It finally happened.
 
(...) Tell ya what, later tonight I'll try to do one like that. I was taking the pictures myself, so it was hard to do anything too elaborate, but I can do more if I have someone else take the picture. I'll keep you posted, like I know all of you (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: It finally happened.
 
(...) What good would that do? No, this is actually happening to my hands, It's part of the healing process. Wilson (25 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: It finally happened.
 
(...) "Sire! The peasents are revolting!" "Yes, yes, I know. They've always been that way." "Yes, but now they're in rebellion!" (25 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Benny Hill... the greatest milkman in the west? (Re: Uselessness of .debate)
 
(...) Just how long did it take y'all to figure out that Benny wasn't PC? I think I had that pegged about two minutes into my first viewing. Steve (25 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: All The Money In The World
 
(...) That would be unethical (which, I believe, is another thread)... However, it is also illegal - and we could debate the reasons why our society has chosen to make such activity illegal, or anything illegal for that matter. Any takers? -Jon :-) (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: It finally happened.
 
Gross!! You need more knights in the pics, and to have them chaining your hand down. Kevin (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: It finally happened.
 
Dip your hand in wax? (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: It finally happened.
 
Dude, that's freakin' nasty. But I guess you only get to take a pic that that once in a lifetime. Now every time I see a halberd I will have this nasty association. Thanks a bunch. First Class. :) (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  It finally happened.
 
All was going well in the fair land of LEGO, when all of the sudden, out of nowhere, the minifigs revolted. (URL) came in the night, halberds in hand. They started hacking and peeling the skin off my hands, rendering them useless, never able to work (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Problems with Christianity
 
Bruce Schlickbernd wrote in message ... (...) Did you realise this is in .fun, Bruce? Kevin (25 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: King, Queen & Jack
 
(...) Well, I haven't seen it before, but the answer is no. I'll refrain from explaining why, for folks still playing at home, but will offer a hint: 'might be true' doesn't hold any weight in logical puzzle solving. Think in terms of must be true (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: All The Money In The World
 
(...) your (...) Isn't this an illustration of the money multiplier effect? The most liquid instruments, M1, which include cash, checks, money orders, etc., have the highest "multiplier" because they circulate faster, increasing the value of money (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  King, Queen & Jack
 
I read Dave's post the wrong way, I thought it one of those trick questions which go around at this time of year. It got me thinking about this one which I read a week or so ago: Only one of the following statements about a particular hand of cards (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR