To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 6328
6327  |  6329
Subject: 
King, Queen & Jack
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Thu, 21 Dec 2000 17:36:22 GMT
Viewed: 
107 times
  
I read Dave's post the wrong way, I thought it one of those trick questions
which go around at this time of year. It got me thinking about this one
which I read a week or so ago:

Only one of the following statements about a particular hand of cards is true:
a. There is a king in the hand, or an ace, or both.
b. There is a queen in the hand, or an ace, or both.
c. There is a jack in the hand, or a ten, or both.

Q. Is it possible that there is an ace in the hand?

If you have seen before, please hold of replying for a bit. These things
never have the same impact when one is expecting trouble - but I thought
this would be fun.

Scott A



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: King, Queen & Jack
 
(...) Well, I haven't seen it before, but the answer is no. I'll refrain from explaining why, for folks still playing at home, but will offer a hint: 'might be true' doesn't hold any weight in logical puzzle solving. Think in terms of must be true (...) (24 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
  Re: King, Queen & Jack
 
Scott A <eh105jb@mx1.pair.com> wrote in message news:G5xI8M.8pC@lugnet.com... (...) questions (...) true: (...) False, it either has to be an either/or statement somewhere in the statement, or must have some rule that can be derived when compared (...) (24 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

10 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR