Subject:
|
Re: King, Queen & Jack
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Fri, 22 Dec 2000 18:50:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
244 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, David Eaton writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Scott Arthur writes:
> > Not persuaded? Try this one - the question in each test is: "Can both
> > statements be true at the same time?"
>
> Hmm... By my read, you probably meant to say in each statement that those
> were the ONLY things on the table? Otherwise I find that only the last test
> has two conflicting statements.
That is the point - you have to decide if there is a conflict within each
test. As you point out, 4 is not true.
>
> DaveE
>
> > Test 1
> >
> > There is a pin and/or a bolt on the table, or else there is a bolt and a
> > nail on the table.
> >
> > There is a bolt and a nail on the table
> >
> > Test 2
> >
> > There is a pin and/or a bolt on the table, or else there is a bolt and a
> > nail on the table.
> >
> > There is a pin and a bolt on the table
> >
> > Test 3
> >
> > There is a pin and/or a bolt on the table, or else there is a bolt and a
> > nail on the table.
> >
> > There is a nail but no bolt on the table
> >
> > Test 4
> >
> > There is a pin and/or a bolt on the table, or else there is a bolt and a
> > nail on the table.
> >
> > There is no pin and no bolt on the table
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: King, Queen & Jack
|
| (...) Hmm... By my read, you probably meant to say in each statement that those were the ONLY things on the table? Otherwise I find that only the last test has two conflicting statements. DaveE (...) (24 years ago, 22-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
