Subject:
|
Re: King, Queen & Jack
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Thu, 21 Dec 2000 18:46:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
109 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Scott Arthur writes:
> I read Dave's post the wrong way, I thought it one of those trick questions
> which go around at this time of year. It got me thinking about this one
> which I read a week or so ago:
>
> Only one of the following statements about a particular hand of cards is true:
> a. There is a king in the hand, or an ace, or both.
> b. There is a queen in the hand, or an ace, or both.
> c. There is a jack in the hand, or a ten, or both.
>
> Q. Is it possible that there is an ace in the hand?
>
> If you have seen before, please hold of replying for a bit. These things
> never have the same impact when one is expecting trouble - but I thought
> this would be fun.
Well, I haven't seen it before, but the answer is no. I'll refrain from
explaining why, for folks still playing at home, but will offer a hint:
'might be true' doesn't hold any weight in logical puzzle solving. Think in
terms of must be true or can't be true.
James
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | King, Queen & Jack
|
| I read Dave's post the wrong way, I thought it one of those trick questions which go around at this time of year. It got me thinking about this one which I read a week or so ago: Only one of the following statements about a particular hand of cards (...) (24 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
