To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 1336
1335  |  1337
Subject: 
Re: galactica news (Re: Viper)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Mon, 12 Apr 1999 20:40:10 GMT
Viewed: 
376 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, jsproat@geocities.com (Sproaticus) writes:
James Brown wrote:
If you ever want to see an amusing account of studios battling it out
in court, the lawsuit that was leveled against BG by SW (or rather,
Universal by 20 Century Fox) is a good one - there was about 4 rounds
of countersuing, which reads very much as "Oh yeah?  Well, you stole
this!"  "Did not!  You took that!"  "Did not!" etc. ad naseum.

That's especially funny when you consider how derivitave SW is of Dune.

SW derivative of Dune?  How so?  SW:ANH released in 1977.  Dune released in
1984.  Did the original Dune book(s) go into SFX-like levels of visual
detail?  Or do you mean Tattooine?

--Todd



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: galactica news (Re: Viper)
 
(...) Dune the movie came out in 1984, though it can be argued that it has little resemblance to the book. OTOH, the book was written long before 1984. (Checking Amazon.com... 25th anniv. on 1996, so that puts first printing around 1971.) I'll take (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: galactica news (Re: Viper)
 
(...) That's especially funny when you consider how derivitave SW is of Dune. Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

21 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR