To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 1112
1111  |  1113
Subject: 
Re: AFOL? OFAL? FOAL? (Was: Is March LEGOFEST kaput?)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Tue, 9 Mar 1999 01:15:12 GMT
Reply-To: 
jsproat@geocities.NOSPAMcom
Viewed: 
966 times
  
Jasper Janssen wrote:
I think lego-human sex would fall under unnatural acts,
defintely (I mean, those _studs_!), unless it involves one of the
Belville figures...

There is *nothing* natural about Belville figures.

Besides, the forest wench is *much* cuter.

Cheers,
- jsproat

--
Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@geocities.com>
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Horizon/5249/
"The world will not perish for want of wonders but for want of wonder"
-- British scientist J. B. S. Haldane (1892-1964)



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: AFOL? OFAL? FOAL? (Was: Is March LEGOFEST kaput?)
 
(...) /s/flaverful/flavourful HTH. (...) Some states ban "Unnatural Acts" - which could be interpreted as anything but the missionary position... And probably intended to ban same-sex sex. I think lego-human sex would fall under unnatural acts, (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

18 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR