Fun : 1072


Off-Topic / Fun / 1072	1071 \| 1073

Subject:	Re: AFOL? OFAL? FOAL? (Was: Is March LEGOFEST kaput?)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date:	Fri, 5 Mar 1999 18:39:18 GMT
Reply-To:	jsproat@geocities!antispam!.com
Viewed:	933 times

Terry K wrote: > My oh-so-simple dictionary has only this to say: > "fondle v. -dling. To handle or stroke affectionately; caress." > Which is more inline with my _intent_ in the post. So I will go on fondling my > lego my way - how other people want to do it is up to them. (1) :-P Wow, this thread is getting pretty... erm... flaverful. :-, > 1. Or up to their local laws - with all the stupid laws on the books, there may > be a law against using lego in such ways. :-) In the state of Georgia, anyway. In Nevada, anything goes. :-, Cheers, - jsproat -- Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@geocities.com> http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Horizon/5249/ "The world will not perish for want of wonders but for want of wonder" -- British scientist J. B. S. Haldane (1892-1964)

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: AFOL? OFAL? FOAL? (Was: Is March LEGOFEST kaput?)
(...) /s/flaverful/flavourful HTH. (...) Some states ban "Unnatural Acts" - which could be interpreted as anything but the missionary position... And probably intended to ban same-sex sex. I think lego-human sex would fall under unnatural acts, (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: AFOL? OFAL? FOAL? (Was: Is March LEGOFEST kaput?)
(...) Whoa! You have a much more exciting dictionary than I do. :-) My oh-so-simple dictionary has only this to say: "fondle v. -dling. To handle or stroke affectionately; caress." Which is more inline with my _intent_ in the post. So I will go on (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

18 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search