To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 1105
1104  |  1106
Subject: 
Re: AFOL? OFAL? FOAL? (Was: Is March LEGOFEST kaput?)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Tue, 9 Mar 1999 00:25:07 GMT
Viewed: 
655 times
  
On Fri, 5 Mar 1999 18:39:18 GMT, Sproaticus <jsproat@geocities.com>
wrote:

Terry K wrote:

Wow, this thread is getting pretty...  erm...  flaverful.  :-,

/s/flaverful/flavourful
HTH.

1. Or up to their local laws - with all the stupid laws on the books, there may
be a law against using lego in such ways.  :-)

In the state of Georgia, anyway.  In Nevada, anything goes.  :-,

Some states ban "Unnatural Acts" - which could be interpreted as
anything but the missionary position... And probably intended to ban
same-sex sex. I think lego-human sex would fall under unnatural acts,
defintely (I mean, those _studs_!), unless it involves one of the
Belville figures...

Jasper



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: AFOL? OFAL? FOAL? (Was: Is March LEGOFEST kaput?)
 
(...) There is *nothing* natural about Belville figures. Besides, the forest wench is *much* cuter. Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: AFOL? OFAL? FOAL? (Was: Is March LEGOFEST kaput?)
 
(...) Wow, this thread is getting pretty... erm... flaverful. :-, (...) In the state of Georgia, anyway. In Nevada, anything goes. :-, Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

18 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR