|
 | | Re: Does it pay to be a Patriot?
|
| (...) Well, they certainly want to be freemen, one of the 22 enumerated statuses of persons in the U.S. Constitution, and that is a worthy goal. But... Patriots, as both you and the govt. call them, are probably a very misunderstood group. Many of (...) (23 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|  
political
(score: 0.368)
|
|
| | Re: Conspiracy theories
|
| What i would like to know is: 1- what really happened to the flight over pennsylvania 2- what happened to the 5th plane that was initially reported to have been highjacked 3- what happened with the car bomb that was reported to have exploded outside (...) (23 years ago, 21-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
worlds
(score: 0.368)
|
|
| |
|
worlds
(score: 0.367)
|
|
| | Alan Keyes is *Interesting*...
|
| I happened to come across this guy Alan Keyes on cable tonight while waiting for "Blue Planet" to come on again at for it's second showing of the night (missed the first one) -- wow, Alan Keyes sure has a lot of interesting opinions. I couldn't (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 0.367)
|
|
| | Re: An armed society...
|
| (...) Eh? Where'd this come from? Are you trying to manufacture a political debate? Anyway, as a strictly amateur political scientist[1] I would never make such a blatant generalization. It depends on the culture, the state of mind of the society in (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 0.366)
|
|
| | ??? (was Re: An armed society...(what if?))
|
| (...) LFB, Kirby is a little too conspiracy prone for my taste also (really, it's his one obvious debate flaw), but that doesn't mean that he is wrong -- the fact is, Kirby is right in most of the broader strokes of his statements, even if he screws (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 0.366)
|
|
| | Re: An armed society...
|
| (...) We don't have to look much further than the last U.S. Presidential election to find confirmation in that! (...) Rule Number 1 of political debates: He Who Mentions Hitler First Loses! :-) Bruce (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 0.366)
|
|
| | Re: An armed society...
|
| (...) Before some of the sillier rhetoric goes much further -- the historical reason for the 2nd Amendment in the U.S. is exactly as Mike states in the above. Yes, we have a system of checks and balances. Yes, we are supposed to have separate (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 0.366)
|
|
| | Words…
|
| (...) No fighting, I haven’t even donned my flame-suit! :) I believe that I put it quite eloquently, talking about “creative anagram” usage, and “relevant content.” (...) Hey, I too agree with Tim, but I just wanted to provide context to the (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
| |
|
political
(score: 0.365)
|
|
| | Re: Future of Humanity (was: lotsa stuff)
|
| (...) I'm not quite sure I agree that those are the reasons we've put evolution on pause. After all, if a species is able to overcome certain challenges (disease, famine, etc), aren't they *not* selection factors? The birth defect thing and genetic (...) (23 years ago, 22-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
worlds
(score: 0.363)
|
|
| |
|
worlds
(score: 0.363)
|
|
| | Re: Hiroshima-Was It Necessary?
|
| Atomic bombs on cities Hijacked planes into towers In my opinion both are equally terrifying. I will stand by my analysis of the word *terror* and apply it to both acts. We praise the pilots as patriots who flew over Japan. We denigrate the (...) (23 years ago, 18-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
worlds
(score: 0.363)
|
|
| |
|
political
(score: 0.362)
|
|
| | Re: Gotta love Oracle...
|
| (...) Hmm, Larry, I think you fired that off without thinking about it, or you're being obtuse. My circumstances have a great deal to do with how hard I work, yes. That applies, in a relative degree, to virtually everyone on the planet (work (...) (23 years ago, 13-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
worlds
(score: 0.362)
|
|
| | Re: Libertarian comes through for the Terrorists
|
| (...) I strongly disagree. It is precisely this kind of knee-jerk, poorly thought out logic that leads us down the path of the destruction of our beloved republic. Protecting our civil rights, enumerated and unemurated in the U.S. Constitution and (...) (23 years ago, 12-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
worlds
(score: 0.362)
|
|
| | Good by Santa... Hello PC
|
| chech this out... (URL) sure it the link will work, if not, then type into your address field. I tried to copy/paste but it seems Lugnet won't allow for this. How do you other folks do links if you can't copy/paste? Anyway, I was of the opinion that (...) (23 years ago, 25-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 0.361)
|
|
| |
|
worlds
(score: 0.361)
|
|
| |
|
political
(score: 0.361)
|
|
| |
|
political
(score: 0.361)
|
|
| | Re: This is disgusting!...
|
| (...) Please don't assume that those of us who didn't comment in any way disagree. I didn't write because there was nothing to say. Yup, it's disgusting. Actually, I don't bear Afghanistan much in the way of grudge because of their role in the (...) (23 years ago, 7-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
worlds
(score: 0.361)
|
