Results 361 – 380 of about 1300.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | Re: Libertarian Propaganda
|
| (...) Economic imperialism, whatever that might be, surely doesn't fall within *this* libertarian's definition of what an appropriate national interest ought to be. Can you define what you mean a bit more? What I think Mark is getting at is that the (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|  
worlds
(score: 1.312)
|
|
| | Re: Concerns with Racial Attitudes and Lego
|
| (...) Semantically, there's no necessary connection. But around 1800 or so, with the rise of scientific racism, the two became linked. It started out as a way for otherwise decent human beings to "justify" the moral rectitude of slavery (and later, (...) (24 years ago, 18-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 1.312)
|
|
| | Re: Libertarian Propaganda
|
| (...) In the good old days it was colonialism and empire building--theft and occupation of other lands and exploitation of the native people and resources. We can't do that anymore today, everybody is watching everybody, so we build an economic (...) (23 years ago, 14-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
worlds
(score: 1.312)
|
|
| | Re: Concerns with Racial Attitudes and Lego
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John DiRienzo writes: First off, I just want to say I apologize to John, I think I misunderstood a lot from here, and we had our own disagreements elsewhere. I sincerely apologize to you Johm, and everyone here, for being (...) (24 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 1.311)
|
|
| | Re: Sanctions (was: Libertarian Propaganda)
|
| (...) Can you provide cites on this? (...) How successful are you at this Daniel? I try to as much as I can. I'm curious about your attempts. Reply offline if you would like. (...) I seriously thought about this when I learned LEGO was shutting down (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
worlds
(score: 1.311)
|
|
| |
|
worlds
(score: 1.310)
|
|
| | Is this sexism?
|
| I'll try not to make this a long ramble, but a short and to-the-point suggestion, and a few questions. I think that companies should give women a day (possibly two) sick days off per month to deal with the physical symptoms of their menstrual cycle. (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
worlds
(score: 1.310)
|
|
| |
|
political
(score: 1.307)
|
|
| |
|
political
(score: 1.307)
|
|
| |
|
political
(score: 1.306)
|
|
| |
|
political
(score: 1.305)
|
|
| | Re: It's All Over...
|
| (...) The system the way it is set up (winner takes all - I'm refering to virtually all political elections in the U.S.) encourages just two parties, and the blandifying of positions. Say the Green party gains momentum and strips liberal votes away (...) (24 years ago, 9-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 1.304)
|
|
| | Reality == fiction?
|
| OK, now we get to the heart of the matter that I was trying to put my finger on when I started this... but before I comment on Josh's post let me say this... Todd kind of backpedaled from his statement that he hates JarJar. I don't think he should (...) (24 years ago, 5-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 1.304)
|
|
| | Re: Can Harry Browne do it?
|
| (...) I haven't actually seen him speak, but he will be the third LP presidential candidate that I will have voted for. I think it all comes down to money, and the LP isn't willing to get enough of it to actually take hold. I am a "belly up to the (...) (24 years ago, 5-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 1.304)
|
|
| | Re: Reality == fiction?
|
| (...) I agree that he was cool, but if you compare the number of times we saw him to the times we saw the other characters before the movie came out, you would think that he was the star. As it turns out he said something, what twice? He is (...) (24 years ago, 5-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.starwars)
| |
|
political
(score: 1.304)
|
|
| | Re: Can Harry Browne do it?
|
| (...) up, they're almost as hilarious as Quayle-isms. Does grammar matter? Here's Roger Ebert's view: (URL) is a very well known film critic who doesn't make a secret of his politics. As a political pundit, he's a pretty good film critic. But he's (...) (24 years ago, 6-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 1.304)
|
|
| | Re: Can Harry Browne do it?
|
| (...) them (...) system (...) That _could_ be the case, but in this real case, it isn't. The differences between their policies are miniscule. (...) I think that your use of who is a fortuitous typo. I'm pretty sure you meant how. The reality is (...) (24 years ago, 7-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 1.304)
|
|
| |
|
political
(score: 1.304)
|
|
| | Re: Reality == fiction?
|
| (...) Clarity, of course, is subjective, and if the humor of a work involves subtlety, then the intent of the work will become unclear to the less perceptive. (...) Are you suggesting that irony requires an explanatory prefix to avoid offending or (...) (24 years ago, 7-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 1.304)
|
|
| | From Harry Browne
|
| Posted in its entirety. Note that I personally do not think it's appropriate to forward this to everyone in your address book as the message advocates, I'm a bit disappointed by that. I only forwarded it to those people that I felt were likely to be (...) (24 years ago, 7-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 1.304)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
