Results 1261 1280 of 1284.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
| | Freud and Religion
|
| This is a paper I wrote for a class I'm taking right now that explores the philosophical implications of the relationship between science and religion. Awesome class, taught, in part, by famous philosopher Michael Ruse. Anyways, I thought my essay (...) (18 years ago, 14-Nov-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| political (score: 0.976) |
|
| | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote: <snip> (...) Speaking of Demogoguery... (URL) wait, he's a Republican. I guess his speechifying can't be considered that. As an aside, I agree with everything Hagel stated and consider him a man of class. (...) (18 years ago, 25-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| political (score: 0.966) |
|
| | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote: <snip> (...) In a literal meaning, war on a noun--eh, hardly humour there In the meaning that we both probaby agree on--a war against fanaticals who appear to have no issue with killing civilians of any (...) (18 years ago, 25-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| political (score: 0.966) |
|
| | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
|
| (...) If Hagel votes "yay" for this silly and pointless non-binding resolution, republicans will throw him under the bus, gahr-un-teed. And that goes for ANY senator with an R after their name. Even HE knows it, as evidenced by his own questioning (...) (18 years ago, 25-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| political (score: 0.966) |
|
| | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
|
| (...) Well, that explains the chickenhawks and diehards, but the overwhelming majority of Americans object to Bush's handling of the war, so you're essentially saying that Republicans are fundamentally out of touch with their electorate. (...) Well, (...) (18 years ago, 25-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| political (score: 0.966) |
|
|
| political (score: 0.965) |
|
| | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
|
| I know you were writing to John, but... (...) Well, probably for a while longer. My thing is that we've taken on a responsibility by mucking things up in Iraq. What we've done so far has be pretty bad. What we'd be doing by bailing out would be even (...) (18 years ago, 6-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| political (score: 0.964) |
|
| | Re: illogical behavior ;)
|
| (...) huh?? The analogy was as close to apt as I had the time to make--Eric (being Bob) had committed transgressions on LUGNET in the past for which he was 'officially' forgiven. Now smomeone maliciosly attacked Eric, and people have chimed in (...) (18 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| political (score: 0.962) |
|
|
| political (score: 0.959) |
|
|
| political (score: 0.959) |
|
|
| political (score: 0.959) |
|
| | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
|
| (...) I was going to quote 'a few good men' for a cheap quotation thing, but instead, in order to score some political karma, I have this quote-- "The GOP has mastered an error condition in the political process, an infinite loop of abstraction that (...) (18 years ago, 22-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| political (score: 0.959) |
|
| | Fox news www
|
| On today's (3-27-07) "Political Grapevine" with Brit Hume there was a piece about teaches banning lego from the class for a while since the teachers didn't like the "(paraphrased)capita...lass-type' things the kids were building. ?!?!?!? the (...) (18 years ago, 28-Mar-07, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| political (score: 0.957) |
|
| | Re: What Censorship Isn't
|
| (...) Actually it doesn't have any such responsibility. It may be prudent to broadcast unaltered information (although it usually isn't, political slant is a good way to differentiate yourself from your competitors) but I'm willing to bet that if (...) (17 years ago, 13-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| political (score: 0.954) |
|
| | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
| (...) I didn't "bother to correct it" because I recognize that the term "doublespeak" has largely entered the public vocabulary as a result of Orwell's work, even if he himself didn't coin the term. Likewise, the Wikipedia article that you cited (...) (17 years ago, 12-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| political (score: 0.954) |
|
|
| political (score: 0.946) |
|
|
| political (score: 0.946) |
|
|
| political (score: 0.945) |
|
|
| political (score: 0.945) |
|
| | Re: We Should've Listened to Dick Cheney
|
| (...) I guess you didn't bother to watch the video. Dick himself used the Q-word to describe the aftermath of a unilateral invasion of Iraq. But that was before he used it to mock people who said operation Blood For Oil was a Bad Idea. (...) Four (...) (17 years ago, 17-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| political (score: 0.935) | More: Next Page >>
|