To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / Search Results: worlds smallest political quiz
 Results 101 – 120 of about 1300.
Search took 0.02 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?
 
(...) We're not the worlds policeman. While the destabilization of, for example, Liberia, may be quite saddening to watch, it's not going to have a long term large impact on us. There is nothing that Liberia has that is a vital interest to us. The (...) (24 years ago, 9-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

worlds
(score: 1.656)

  Re: My one minute recap of the recent debate wreck...
 
(...) Since 70% of the world's fresh water is locked up as ice in Antarctica, I presume the 40% is refering to liquid water. Just break me off a chunk the size of Connecticut and let's make a really big Margarita... Bruce ("Let's blow this 'berg," (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

worlds
(score: 1.656)

  Re: The skinny on Jenin, the European Press
 
(...) Well the West Bank is the world's worst place to be a journalist: (URL) A (22 years ago, 27-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

worlds
(score: 1.656)

  Re: A question of remembrance...
 
(...) Right. Hence my question, is it our duty to be the world's policeman (in the area of incoming missiles) just because we CAN? I tend to say no. I say build the thing and then announce that there is a 1B USD charge per missile for stopping (...) (23 years ago, 7-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

worlds
(score: 1.656)

  Re: Guess who's next?
 
(...) ...while troops were busy toppling statutes for the benefit of the world's media. Scott A (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

worlds
(score: 1.656)

  Re: Quick Poll - Kyoto
 
(...) I am not sure I agree. Kyoto provided a framework for the worlds biggest polluters to reduce their polluting output. If you think it is not as good as it could be as it focuses on 40 or so industrialised economies - but ignores the developing (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

worlds
(score: 1.656)

  Re: The PATRIOT act is a fine law!
 
(...) Er, oops! (currently within 20 miles of the worlds largest naval base... Santa Claus is waterskiing outside my balcony) (20 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

worlds
(score: 1.656)

  Arrogance floats amongst the stars...
 
I'm almost at a loss for words. At a time when the world's (including many Americans, btw) opinion was against Bush and Co. for their mismanagement of the Iraqi situation, those stupid <insert expletive here> go do what they did. I don't swear much, (...) (20 years ago, 12-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

worlds
(score: 1.655)

  Re: How many things need to stack up before we throw this jerk out?
 
(...) It is time that all of the world's tinpot leaders get the message that supporting terrorism and terrorists will lead to their ruin. (...) That may have been good advice 200 years ago, but the world is a smaller place today. There is no more (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

worlds
(score: 1.655)

  Re: Future of Humanity (was: lotsa stuff)
 
(...) I'm not quite sure I agree that those are the reasons we've put evolution on pause. After all, if a species is able to overcome certain challenges (disease, famine, etc), aren't they *not* selection factors? The birth defect thing and genetic (...) (23 years ago, 22-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

worlds
(score: 1.655)

  Percents, Per Se
 
(...) That's fabulous! I read an article back in '92 that proclaimed we'd already discovered 90% of the world's oil. Dave! (23 years ago, 14-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 

worlds
(score: 1.655)

  Re: Far too good to pass up...
 
(...) I'd like to the United States of the Left Coast secede and take our world's fifth largest economy with us so that we won't continue to be tax donors to the Deadbeat States that voted for Dubya. Better dead than "red". ;-) -->Bruce<-- (20 years ago, 15-Nov-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

worlds
(score: 1.655)

  Re: Here's one of the many things I don't understand...
 
(...) A lot of people in America aren't impressed with us being the world's policemen, either, regardless of the individual cases. But to run down the list... Pakistan: if we were to deal with Pakistan, we would have to deal with the trigger device (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

worlds
(score: 1.655)

  Re: It didn't have to be this way....
 
(...) …a despot who was explicitly supported by the West. (...) Some of the world's problems do lie at the feet of the "West". (...) I understand your point. However, we should not make the mistake of believing that those who violently oppose the (...) (20 years ago, 13-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

worlds
(score: 1.655)

  Re: Supply-Side Economics? The Evidence Says No!
 
(...) I've never heard it said that the US consumes 75% of the worlds resources. I've heard it consumes 25%. Are you learning percentages from Dave Schuler? (...) To be honest it kind of is. Your rates of literacy and numeracy are incredibly poor by (...) (18 years ago, 17-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

worlds
(score: 1.655)

  Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?
 
(...) We're veering around, I think Mike and Ed and I are sparring about the US, where it's pretty hard to ignore the truth about how to catch it at this point, it being common knowledge. There may be remote parts of the world that haven't figured (...) (24 years ago, 10-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

worlds
(score: 1.655)

  Re: Liberterian comes through for the Bill of Rights (was a slur
 
(...) Go to Iceland. They have that there. According to _Maxim_ (not the worlds most reliable source) anyway. (...) Implied right to privacy makes it unconstitutional for government to require it, I think. (anyway it's required to make the example (...) (23 years ago, 19-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

worlds
(score: 1.655)

  Re: This Californian Has Voted. Have You?
 
(...) Out of curiosity, what led you to conclude that Arnold was the best qualified candidate to head the world's fifth-largest economy? (...) One reason is that this is a potential violation of voter privacy. Another reason was that this courteous (...) (21 years ago, 7-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

worlds
(score: 1.655)

  Re: Not the right way to exit?
 
(...) I liked Dave K's response here, so this is just embellishment. As long as we bill ourselves as the world's policeman it is. As soon as cops can't enforce, they lose their power. That's where we are now. But that's the wrong reason. We should (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

worlds
(score: 1.655)

  Re: What about the first?
 
(...) <snip> (...) It's not that I have a problem with religious fanatics, it's what those fanatics *do*. I would venture that 90% of the world's terrorism is perpetrated by Muslim fanatics. (...) The US has *no* intention of destroying Iraq, but (...) (22 years ago, 18-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

worlds
(score: 1.655)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR