Results 181 200 of about 1900.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
|
| bruce (score: 0.522) |
|
| | Re: Fair and Balanced, as always.
|
| (...) You edited out everything but what was convenient to your attack and you think you won't be called on it? You missed your calling, John, you should be heading the election to re-elect Bush. :-) -->Bruce<-- (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| bruce (score: 0.522) |
|
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| (...) A quick Brickshelf search reveals this one as well: (URL) sure I've seen others out there. Since minifig designs already exist for cowboys and Indians, construction workers, police, etc, this is pretty straightforward. Bruce (20 years ago, 15-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| bruce (score: 0.522) |
|
| | Re: Microsoft and IBM in secret plot?
|
| (...) Ideaology. People don't want to believe that their candidate can do any wrong because the alternative is electing a guy that they disagree with. So, they stick their head in the sand, and pretend like these things aren't fundamental flaws that (...) (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| bruce (score: 0.522) |
|
| | Re: Microsoft and IBM in secret plot?
|
| (...) I should have read the paper this morning - the secretray thing was on the fold and I tossed the paper in the car without reading it. Interesting. She doesn't confirm the memos as real, but confirms Bush's commanding officer's opinions (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| bruce (score: 0.522) |
|
| | Re: Help me with the math
|
| (...) I do not think that is truly representing it accurately. It was Dubya's staff that rather willfully read into the intelligence what they wanted to hear, or possibly exploited what was there by presenting what the higher ups wanted/expected to (...) (20 years ago, 11-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| bruce (score: 0.522) |
|
|
| bruce (score: 0.522) |
|
| | Re: Help me with the math
|
| (...) John said "Bush is brilliant" and that is what I am arguing about. Not "Clinton is an idiot". John is playing a game: Bush is not responsible for anything that has gone wrong, it's all Somebody Else's Fault. Essentially, he's trying to drag (...) (20 years ago, 10-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| bruce (score: 0.521) |
|
| | Re: Help me with the math
|
| (...) I have some comment on the tip of my tongue about what you could be eating in the meantime, but somehow, (hint, it involves the President's last name) I'm not sure I can say that on Lugnet. _ :-0 - Is it still missing, by the way? (Munch's The (...) (20 years ago, 10-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| bruce (score: 0.521) |
|
| | Re: Help me with the math
|
| (...) That would be included in what I said. However, there are no WoMD and no Al Qaeda connections. Bush can believe what he wants, but I am saying he should be held accountable for his mistakes. (...) He just released a new claim that America is (...) (20 years ago, 10-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| bruce (score: 0.521) |
|
| | Re: Help me with the math
|
| (...) Look up the quote chain and you'll see I established "immenent use of WoMD". Basically, you are agreeing with me. All you did is weasel in the words "bad man". (...) You accept that lame explanation? You are satisfied with that? A shrug of the (...) (20 years ago, 9-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| bruce (score: 0.521) |
|
|
| bruce (score: 0.521) |
|
|
| bruce (score: 0.521) |
|
| | Re: Help me with the math
|
| (...) That has absolutely nothing to do with the point. Bush sold the war on the basis of "WoMD" (Weapons of Mass Destruction for anyone wandering by) and when Bush couldn't find any, he came up with the "bad man" excuse. Bait and switch. (...) That (...) (20 years ago, 9-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| bruce (score: 0.521) |
|
| | Re: Help me with the math
|
| (...) I think they lobbed a few petulant shells from U-Boats at us, but it is immaterial whether they actually attacked U.S. soil: they declared war on us a few days after the Pearl Harbor attack. (...) You keep piping up with tha line. Bush's (...) (20 years ago, 8-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| bruce (score: 0.521) |
|
|
| bruce (score: 0.521) |
|
|
| bruce (score: 0.521) |
|
|
| bruce (score: 0.521) |
|
| | Re: Fair use and allusion?
|
| (...) Why are you telling US this? Why aren't you on the podium at the Republican convention? For a party that detests Moore, they are bigger liars and prevaricators (and True Liarnators) than Moore. :-) -->Bruce<-- (20 years ago, 3-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| bruce (score: 0.520) |
|
| | Re: policies
|
| (...) What?!? Would you have them run on their record? Thousands murdered while they stood around, still haven't found the guy responsible, went after the wrong guy for the wrong reasons, and Their Number One Guy still can't account for where he was (...) (20 years ago, 3-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| bruce (score: 0.520) | More: Next Page >>
|