Subject:
|
Re: Fair use and allusion?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 3 Sep 2004 03:19:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
842 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> I found this para particularly relevant:
>
> "Moore described his movie as an "op-ed piece," not a documentary. Well, I know
> something about op-ed pieces. Over the long run, you don't get anywhere just
> whacking your audience upside the head; you try to change the mind within it.
> You don't just go for the gut. You try, gulp, reason."
Why are you telling US this? Why aren't you on the podium at the Republican
convention? For a party that detests Moore, they are bigger liars and
prevaricators (and True Liarnators) than Moore. :-)
-->Bruce<--
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Fair use and allusion?
|
| (...) Because I care more about you guys than I do the Republican conventioneers? Man their speakers do drone on, don't they? (...) See above. (...) Agreed. But besides the point I was making, which is that Moore damages his causes merely by being (...) (20 years ago, 3-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Fair use and allusion?
|
| I happened to find an interesting cite. I think it's germane to the section of the post below I haven't trimmed away (...) This is an op-ed piece written by Ellen Goodman: (URL) found this para particularly relevant: "Moore described his movie as an (...) (20 years ago, 2-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
106 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
