|
| | Re: Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less?
|
| (...) No - I'm not a Calvinist, not Arminian either. I don't accept all of either of their writings. Calvin claimed to be infallable! Couldn't take him seriously after that. Arminius I liked a little more, but don't agree with most of what he says - (...) (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| half (score: 0.266) |
|
|
| half (score: 0.266) |
|
|
| half (score: 0.266) |
|
| | Re: LP POINT 1
|
| The usual massive and capricious snippage. (...) I'm not sure I'd agree that the degree of change (since the enlightenment, or more specifically, in the last 20 years) is that small. Certainly it's not as large as I'd wish it but it's a lot more (...) (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| half (score: 0.266) |
|
| | Re: Today's the day.
|
| (...) I enjoy constructive reasoned debate, sure. (...) Actually, it's the Canadian Reform Conservative Alliance. ie. C.R.C.A. (...) Actually I find the 22minute guy quite funny, including this particular bit. For those who would claim that such an (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| half (score: 0.266) |
|
|
| half (score: 0.266) |
|
| | Re: Rush: "Lego is a Tool for 4 year olds"
|
| (...) Driving around with a black woman in my car sure revealed this. Suddenly I started getting stopped for fix-it tickets. My favorite was when they noted a broken light on the far side of the car that they couldn't see when they turned on their (...) (25 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| bruce (score: 0.265) |
|
|
| bruce (score: 0.264) |
|
|
| bruce (score: 0.264) |
|
|
| half (score: 0.264) |
|
|
| half (score: 0.264) |
|
|
| half (score: 0.264) |
|
| | Re: Rights, Who needs them? (was Re: Abortion...
|
| (...) Scott, think this through, and give an answer: what superior power of decision making does the government (which is a collection of people) have that any other collection of people could have? What makes the legislatures and other government (...) (24 years ago, 13-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| half (score: 0.264) |
|
|
| bruce (score: 0.264) |
|
|
| half (score: 0.264) |
|
| | Re: Larry isn't amusing
|
| (...) The preceeding line did not appear in Larry's original message, and the way it appears it seems to be written by him. This is not the case. I'm not quite sure how it got there, but I have double-checked, and he did not say it. I wish to (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| bruce (score: 0.264) |
|
|
| bruce (score: 0.263) |
|
| | Re: Keeping Larry Amused
|
| (...) Larry, you cut the attrib to Richard, so you make it look like I was saying that to you (wiggle). Further, you cut the part that prompted my response (wiggle). The part was more critical of the person I was responding to (wiggle). That person (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| bruce (score: 0.263) |
|
| | Re: Keeping Larry Amused
|
| (...) or (...) Toppling stiff? I don't know why, but that phrase gives me the giggles. I love it. "Dear, there's another toppling stiff out by the jacaranda. Do you think you could pop out and clean things up a bit before the Burgess's arrive? (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| bruce (score: 0.263) |
|
| | Re: Keeping Larry Amused
|
| (...) I take it you don't read your own messages. You have outwiggled me the whole way. (...) For someone who doesn't understand, you summed it up pretty accurately. You basically said if their is no public assistance then there can be no objection (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| bruce (score: 0.263) |